Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-13

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 28 July 2020 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE703A0CF4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qup8TIPYe1J8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946FF3A0CFC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:e077:d81a:af4b:b5a0] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:e077:d81a:af4b:b5a0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C71FB612B77; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:58:32 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1595919512; bh=ifcIPIy0z17iYwlo10fjhtpGxP4OytKfL3hsJFUWguY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=VEbKVIuuektDX4ooWvizgJVd5rdK+V3dXkY1DLiNpCcd9lZ3kirYdK1iVRXWZ8gdC 57izf3n5DDgstOhPaP5QGsoFNnenanWb9oSWfHbI4dqp/FdqjKjJjeLr8VF/hfpbBv eVBkVZtx6pU1NaKSJ9p4tLsNGshuExgoxMNIWy4w=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <FC682E9C-718A-4E42-8981-87F7824CF1EE@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2F6327B-A2C8-4DD1-9657-CB5D1EC08013"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:58:32 +0300
In-Reply-To: <FE044966-F0B7-4B0F-AD69-6B2F09AA0C1E@fh-muenster.de>
Cc: Gorry Fairhust <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
References: <5D8509CA.7010206@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <A3FB9E59-C9F4-46D4-8327-BCDECAD96E8C@eggert.org> <FE044966-F0B7-4B0F-AD69-6B2F09AA0C1E@fh-muenster.de>
X-MailScanner-ID: C71FB612B77.A565C
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/v3xYU4zq1j3LlD1KcYtcLfZGeoo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-13
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:58:50 -0000

On 2019-10-3, at 14:37, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
> On 3. Oct 2019, at 13:35, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
>> it'll be nine years in November since the WG adopted this document, and almost 15 years since the first drafts were published. Isn't it time to abandon this effort?
> Or finish it? I need to address two sets of comments, which I plan to do in the next two weeks...

Just wanted to point out that it's been almost a year since my last email and we seem no closer to finishing this.

Lars