IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023

mengtong <mengtong1@huawei.com> Mon, 19 June 2023 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mengtong1@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A20C1522DA for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 01:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QbKqluwNcloo for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 01:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DFA3C15199A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 01:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Ql39j39TMz6D8q9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:40:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpeml500015.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.226) by lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:42:43 +0100
Received: from dggpeml500015.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.226) by dggpeml500015.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.226) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:42:41 +0800
Received: from dggpeml500015.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.226]) by dggpeml500015.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.226]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.027; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:42:41 +0800
From: mengtong <mengtong1@huawei.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023
Thread-Index: Admih6RdCTds5B98Ry6b6uPfyt7X6Q==
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:42:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4fbbe2c5f4544afd802d37472daac2b9@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.140.244.190]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/vuUoZIVJ_iCxQOWPGq2-VaPmjks>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:42:50 -0000

Hi Gorry, hi all,

I have been following the progress of MP-DCCP with great interest for some time. Given authors' previous feedback on their deployment efforts (e.g., the Linux public reference implementation), I believe PS is the right track for MP-DCCP. Btw, I would also be happy to review the draft after the WGLC.

Tong

-----Original Message-----

Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:59:29 +0100
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for
	draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023
Message-ID: <9cab8883-9dd9-1c59-cdfd-4a185e97c8ce@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

The TSVWG has an active work item to develop a specification for MP-DCCP, and the WG Chairs are considering a request from the editors to publish on the standards track.

This topic was discussed at IETF-115 and IETF-116, and an update was then requested to clarify the position with respect to the use with concurrent multipath scheduling. New text on that topic has been included in the latest draft and the chairs are now asking if there are addional concerns or issues that the working group ought to consider, and specifically any comments on the proposal to publish this on the standards track.

This request for WG Feedback will run for 2 weeks, ending on June 23rd 2023. Please respond to this email thread if you have additional comments on the intended status of the specification.

Best wishes,

Gorry and Marten
(tsvwg co-chairs)

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp/

Expectations for a PS are described in RFC 2026,? Section 4.1.1.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/attachments/20230606/0afef2a6/attachment.htm>

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email