Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 28 July 2020 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0293A0D63 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTo1PF12C0zd for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362A3A0D5A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GF-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03ADE1B0013A; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:53:20 +0100 (BST)
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <5D8509CA.7010206@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <A3FB9E59-C9F4-46D4-8327-BCDECAD96E8C@eggert.org> <FE044966-F0B7-4B0F-AD69-6B2F09AA0C1E@fh-muenster.de> <FC682E9C-718A-4E42-8981-87F7824CF1EE@eggert.org>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <dba1cbe5-06e8-d0f1-064a-6b04a3384cec@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:52:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FC682E9C-718A-4E42-8981-87F7824CF1EE@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/wCYf--ipJb4jh4vsphnYuZjrFxY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:53:27 -0000

In the WG meeting today, it was suggested by the Chairs that the WG 
should proceed to a last LC of this document, which we plan to start 
this week. Thanks to all who contributed to this work over the years, 
and especially for the feedback over the last year that have allowed to 
reach this point. Please send to the list if you have comments.

Gorry

On 28/07/2020 07:58, Lars Eggert wrote:
> On 2019-10-3, at 14:37, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
>> On 3. Oct 2019, at 13:35, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
>>> it'll be nine years in November since the WG adopted this document, and almost 15 years since the first drafts were published. Isn't it time to abandon this effort?
>> Or finish it? I need to address two sets of comments, which I plan to do in the next two weeks...
> Just wanted to point out that it's been almost a year since my last email and we seem no closer to finishing this.
>
> Lars