Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Checksum Change to the IESG
From: Scott Bradner <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 14:29:23 -0400 (EDT)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>

> It makes reasonable sense to pass up the received CRC, but recommending
> passing up a computed new CRC would be an unreasonable constraint on CRC
> implementations. 

I don't quite get this objection

the text in question makes a recommendation it does not mandate
and it does not claim that its the only way

Scott

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg