[tsvwg] Fwd: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Clarifications to UENC text (Issue #65)
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sun, 11 August 2024 03:22 UTC
Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C78DC14F738 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9FLlFTpD16M for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD31C15171B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAE52BA97 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 23:22:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type; s=sasl; bh=OkuNejgE75GzALCrBikLhPnnJzq6a4IjBGx gnA26swA=; b=DEhBtX6NzcnVxQd9RJTG2if03vXfJ5y5m7CyjDcr/nFaf3wajYz J1ayBQ7GnJ9qIuMjl3S3zgK0e1osPus8tRsspcxDRBtQ5raWpDC2X7gQyn3wdh/e 6gkH7a1F8LvS75cWt3kE6djrnrm5Xeayap3gu0my0ReK+KgrBTglLI1w=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CE72BA96 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 23:22:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (unknown [209.85.208.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9613A2BA95 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 23:22:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f1a7faa4d5so20540171fa.3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YygoShZLfN+bxdFOucn+MYZjxTN9jbGLfbZfednMxLnBy52hyCY Ya3HN05KXfYxY+JMCMVRWjd8KYsWcX6mlXJY8zGU6XulluzUpIFvNbSvn7Dd61DE5mvsdd+h6GV y8fwdd/2KTPAHgF7cKwAS9pha2+o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4UiWiXbKxT8RXBqK9oWQKXCBID0eQR9FHQ9Y2lSM7Hj4Le+DjLCjClN9YEsZMvVKwVvBrf/otYgjJJUJ75Zg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2825:b0:52c:e047:5c38 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-530ee98c78fmr3701777e87.15.1723346554165; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65@github.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:22:19 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VHCHNhaC40pcR2xdeOu=2q-R8xUG6q7xMiKr5Tqsi5nBw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VHCHNhaC40pcR2xdeOu=2q-R8xUG6q7xMiKr5Tqsi5nBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002fa826061f5fe3de"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F43C7328-5790-11EF-8436-2BAEEB2EC81B-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Message-ID-Hash: XSJ24SO3KZKD4YXDJK6JLAWRGSZCSNOU
X-Message-ID-Hash: XSJ24SO3KZKD4YXDJK6JLAWRGSZCSNOU
X-MailFrom: heard@pobox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Clarifications to UENC text (Issue #65)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/x8ZLCwLMqhxL5CoeD3sEIinxwYY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
This concerns a post-WGLC issue. Please comment on GitHub <https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65> if you have concerns. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Mike-Heard <notifications@github.com> Date: Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 8:20 PM Subject: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Clarifications to UENC text (Issue #65) To: tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options < draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options@noreply.github.com> Cc: Mike-Heard <heard@pobox.com>, Your activity < your_activity@noreply.github.com> The editor's copy of -33 has updated text for Section 12.2. Changes are shown below in *bold*. OLD: The UNSAFE Encryption (UENC, Kind=193) option is reserved for all UDP encryption mechanisms. UENC is expected to *cover the UDP user data and some (e.g., later, in sequence) UDP options, with possible additional protection of portions of the IP and UDP headers and potentially also support for NAT traversal, in a similar manner as TCP-AO [RFC6978].* NEW: The UNSAFE Encryption (UENC, Kind=193) option is reserved for all UDP encryption mechanisms. UENC is expected to *provide all of the services of the AUTH option (Section 11.9) and in addition to encrypt the UDP user data and some (e.g., later, in sequence) UDP options, in a similar manner as TCP-AO-ENC [To18].* The stipulation that UENC provides the services of AUTH is a clarification only, as there is already text in Section 10 that says "AUTH and UENC are never used together, as UENC would serve both purposes." Likewise, updating the reference to [To18] (which is otherwise unused) simply restores what was there before this option because a placeholder. Please speak up if you find this change objectionable. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BBA6FAVRCK2YEQLARHXX7N3ZQ3KBRAVCNFSM6AAAAABMKLVCUOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQ2TSMZZHA3TIMI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65@github.com>