Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i.e., stuck)
Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Mon, 16 March 2020 08:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2253A213C
for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9luGKuL1GGCw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cl3.bcs-hosting.net (cl3.bcs-hosting.net [3.11.37.202])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4D53A2137
for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:
Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=e6akXxEy98BmRBWhsEBAUUi/40n3pdA4PopXC8ah3sE=; b=879+sPq6uxejQXRvL7L03woaQ
IVXvp1OsbyvtImI1A93TiKXSftX2UuTsi2NQQ6vHKoe6hPZZ/rwkOugp3YefWiJcr/7+VZKwCme1t
Xqrr65UVqHxH0b0G58rIGMvTA1QMkYUnyW7ewFUprAqAmVvoakAxnNXE9h5Knuf3gWxNSZ0rsDmhS
GhWiMH0GOFLISwuvVNOXfYa6gIm7EZDjWDx0eWO9gRwER7xRDYqq1KBTwdVYZhLjqROciRDYxivuI
f7VPfL3P+e1lnFB2abs0nZrsVIueLFRgk2C9mawOeYTcdgTekas4I/GXYW6nFUbeG/jTU9EauUhsI
gqqi6dKfQ==;
Received: from host-79-78-166-168.static.as9105.net ([79.78.166.168]:58544
helo=[192.168.2.5]) by cl3.bcs-hosting.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93)
(envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>)
id 1jDlPJ-0068oA-SC; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:47:34 +0000
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936306F8925@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
<2873ab79-19ad-0541-e3a4-d1d28dbc7ba0@bobbriscoe.net>
<B6D58310-41E0-4172-B555-D28E7926A0B5@gmail.com>
<3ee6e427-9dc9-e885-21a9-df9e35d99006@bobbriscoe.net>
<C1696430-D2D2-48BB-AB17-EFB77EE474DE@gmail.com>
<5d8f11f3-9def-14b1-4923-4eb02caf51eb@bobbriscoe.net>
<50B14177-EB29-4273-839C-D22CCC47511E@gmail.com>
<4f66ba3e-9eed-03cd-7f45-a1d7d10ec697@bobbriscoe.net>
<FF777393-47B2-4B53-AD41-5883B2D67CC5@gmail.com>
<264398ad-59eb-7cfd-0276-35ae0f0120a5@bobbriscoe.net>
<44EB050C-C35C-47A0-BC78-3EEDB683B507@gmail.com>
<c802dddc-8a55-47ea-9976-06771d39c952@bobbriscoe.net>
<B3A657D0-EA9D-45EC-8003-21D158F83E06@gmx.de>
<ea8fd9d7-82bc-7da0-a08d-31a2d46abe36@bobbriscoe.net>
<D0036DCD-424F-46B0-819B-D9E60828CB50@gmx.de>
<8acc44d5-d003-2a92-460e-81f31a26cc9b@bobbriscoe.net>
<83D1EDCB-068A-4C3C-AB25-62CA11F30E26@strayalpha.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <8ed283a3-3f97-f76e-824c-a0cd727cc39e@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:47:33 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83D1EDCB-068A-4C3C-AB25-62CA11F30E26@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------DC10007E661D743F9FD5623F"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cl3.bcs-hosting.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cl3.bcs-hosting.net: authenticated_id:
in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: cl3.bcs-hosting.net: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At:
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/xGjU5xEZ7O47PcSbFCnp1a7Ljdg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i.e., stuck)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>,
<mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>,
<mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:47:38 -0000
Joe, On 15/03/2020 19:53, Joseph Touch wrote: > >> [BB] I should add that PLPMTUD and clamping the max packet size >> complement each other. > > Except that PLPMTUD works over authenticated or encrypted transport > headers and clamping does not. > > Clamping could be useful if the information were in an IP header that > could be ignored by routers that don’t care (e.g, by not slowing them > down, as IP options do). [BB] I think I see what the terminology problem is here. I was using the term MSS clamping from this measurement study by Gorry's group: https://iain.learmonth.me/stuff/pubs/UsableMTU2018.pdf but it uses the same term whether networks do the clamping or end-systems do. In my sentence that you've quoted, I was using it to mean the sender limiting the size of the IP payload to a lower value than could have actually traversed the path. Sorry for not making that clear. Also, in case it wasn't clear, when I said clamping and PLPMTUD complement each other, I meant the sender initially clamping the payload size, then subsequently using PLPMTUD and removing its clamp to use a larger, more efficient packet size instead. Bob > > Joe -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
- [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i.e.,… Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation (was: Status … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation (was: Sta… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… John Leslie
- Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] SCE / L4S and fragmentation Black, David