[tsvwg] Re: New IETF Mtg Network Stats on ECN and NQB

"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Thu, 23 July 2026 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C5E11D78BC4; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784815757; bh=be5Nd8DDyhhuuFxr6dUBufL7uLdmBIkwItjX34KtOeM=; h=From:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:CC; b=DEefpjlT3Ia1ubqg8vCkwgGZIz34MVGr/JucO8Tm/cqrLNZ8sHcooj/1vZ0rem6Em SonZEySMpTMD3B+CUELNJrRvRzwQCoAwbyaRrlQqZwMy2SDp+0Bmkc59JDMumwut0O VV57f9JDxZe3iyklb17fMShXcfZBnZ/OWHz1P6d8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RqXNvlE967Ox; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from afbr1.dnsmgr.net (sce.dnsmgr.net [65.75.216.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC92911D78BBE; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 66MDRsuQ006773; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 66MDRrIR006772; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202607221327.66MDRrIR006772@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <1B86C48F-D755-4AEB-B477-C8113BDBA91B@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0=40gmx.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID-Hash: K2NOLKVJOAAWNZVFPE46SEZVWCP3G5R7
X-Message-ID-Hash: K2NOLKVJOAAWNZVFPE46SEZVWCP3G5R7
X-MailFrom: ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: New IETF Mtg Network Stats on ECN and NQB
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/y0jBkjFIjC0ULuuHsqjP652EOpg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:09:17 -0000
X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT)

> Hi Jason,
> 
> looks great.
> 
> > On Jul 22, 2026, at 09:56, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > 
> > FYI - The IETF network dashboard is now tracking NQB and ECN marking. If you go to https://dashboard.meeting.ietf.org/ and click the ?Advanced? mode toggle in the upper right, then the metrics are shown. Scroll down a little.
> > <Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 09.53.04.png> Thanks to the network team for doing this!!
> 
> One request though, the different ECNs probably would be easier to read if each was plotted as an independent line based on 0 instead of the current approach of plotting all on top of each other, no?

And better yet would it be possible to get this as "data", ie csv, table, something other than a post processed horrid marketing graph?
Then one could actually extract something meaningful.

> > Jason

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org