[tsvwg] CONCLUSION OF ADOPTION CALL for draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sat, 22 April 2023 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87E2C152D95 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-G8olJ75JBc for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D813C14CEE3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (114.152.7.51.dyn.plus.net [51.7.152.114]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D26331B000FC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:38:09 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <599a0477-fedf-8991-070c-4ca89fbaeb28@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:38:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/yJ9P0sl_WqGsRry9eh5tJvQzPKQ>
Subject: [tsvwg] CONCLUSION OF ADOPTION CALL for draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 07:38:18 -0000
This email completes an adoption call for draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum to request adoption as a work item in TSVWG. The chairs noted that in the IETF-116 meeting there were 14 hands in favor of adopting this draft as WG item, and none against. In the following working group adoption call on the mailing list we saw: Victor Boivie Not aware of any IPRs related to draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum Michael Tuexen Not aware of any IPRs related to draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum Randell Jesup Not aware of any IPRs related to draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum Nils Ohlmeier Supports adoption of draft for WebRTC endpoints Claudio Porfiri Supports adoption and will review Mike Heard Supports adoption and will review Michael Welzl Commented in the adoption call Magnus Westerlund Asked questions relating to the scope of SCTP/UDP for zero checksum when RFC 6951 encapsulation occurs and the SCTP stack uses SCTP-AUTH or CRYPTO chunk. Thank you to all who responded in both of these calls. The Chairs conclude that the adoption was successful and that we shall make the next revision of this ID a work item for TSVWG, targeting publication on the Standards Track as a PS. Best wishes, Gorry and Marten (TSVWG Co-Chairs)
- [tsvwg] CONCLUSION OF ADOPTION CALL for draft-tue… Gorry Fairhurst