[tsvwg] Document Action: 'Considerations for Assigning a new Recommended DiffServ Codepoint (DSCP)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-13.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 03 March 2023 21:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, david.black@dell.com, draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations@ietf.org, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <167787982516.47703.17942755535550472107@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 13:43:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/yryvnFwXIEwBbwiPjz7nJmOliQc>
Subject: [tsvwg] Document Action: 'Considerations for Assigning a new Recommended DiffServ Codepoint (DSCP)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-13.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Considerations for Assigning a new Recommended DiffServ Codepoint
   (DSCP)'
  (draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-13.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Transport Area Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Zaheduzzaman Sarker and Martin Duke.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations/





Technical Summary

   This document discusses considerations for assigning a new
   recommended DiffServ Code Point (DSCP) for a new standard Per Hop
   Behavior (PHB).  It considers the common observed remarking behaviors
   that the DiffServ field might be subjected to along an Internet path.
   It also notes some implications of using a specific DSCP.

Working Group Summary

   This draft is supported by the portion of the tsvwg working group that
is familiar with and interested in Diffserv.  The draft has received
significant review and critique from a number of Diffserv experts,
including the draft shepherd.  There is clear consensus in the WG to
document these lessons learned, and this draft has not been
controversial in the WG.

Document Quality

   This informational draft does not have a protocol to implement.

Personnel

   The Shepherd is David Black. The AD is Martin Duke.

[tsvwg] Document Action: 'Considerations for Assi… The IESG