IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: status of tuba documents

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Mon, 12 December 1994 21:37 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08899; 12 Dec 94 16:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08893; 12 Dec 94 16:37 EST
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15038; 12 Dec 94 16:37 EST
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id OAA09421; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 14:36:47 -0700
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.9/SMI-4.1) id OAA05905; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 14:36:39 -0700
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.9/SMI-4.1) id OAA05902; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 14:36:38 -0700
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id OAA09387; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 14:36:40 -0700
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id QAA16557; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 16:38:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 16:38:21 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199412122138.QAA16557@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: dave@corecom.com, sob@newdev.harvard.edu, tuba@lanl.gov
Subject: Re: status of tuba documents

Dave,
	Should we be looking at only a full function FTPng or both
an extension to the existing FTP (along the lines of FOOBAR) and
a longer term revision with things like restart/resynchronization after 
failure and checkpointing?

	I could see the base IPng WG doing FOOBAR but would think that
a new WG would be needed for a full FTPng.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email