Re: Status of IPng

"Peter S. Ford" <peter@goshawk.lanl.gov> Tue, 19 July 1994 14:28 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05817; 19 Jul 94 10:28 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05809; 19 Jul 94 10:28 EDT
Received: from [128.165.3.12] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09425; 19 Jul 94 10:28 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id IAA20261; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:27:12 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id IAA02947; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:26:58 -0600
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id IAA02944; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:26:58 -0600
Received: from goshawk.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id IAA20102; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:26:57 -0600
Received: from localhost.lanl.gov (localhost.lanl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by goshawk.lanl.gov (8.6.9/8.6.4) with SMTP id IAA19704; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:26:21 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Peter S. Ford" <peter@goshawk.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199407191426.IAA19704@goshawk.lanl.gov>
X-Authentication-Warning: goshawk.lanl.gov: Host localhost.lanl.gov didn't use HELO protocol
To: Keith Sklower <sklower@vangogh.cs.berkeley.edu>
cc: tuba@lanl.gov
Subject: Re: Status of IPng
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 18 Jul 94 19:34:03 -0700. <199407190234.TAA14548@vangogh.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 08:26:20 -0700


Keith,

In the past, the IESG has rejected the notion of doing CLNP work in the
IETF. They have subsequently reversed themselves, in the last 4-5 months.
I think if people wanted to continue the evolution of CLNP they 
should put together a working group charter and submit it 
to the IESG.

cheers, peter