IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: status of tuba documents

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Mon, 12 December 1994 17:57 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05616; 12 Dec 94 12:57 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05612; 12 Dec 94 12:57 EST
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10333; 12 Dec 94 12:57 EST
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA02284; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:57:41 -0700
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.9/SMI-4.1) id KAA03342; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:57:33 -0700
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.9/SMI-4.1) id KAA03339; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:57:32 -0700
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA02210; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:57:33 -0700
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id MAA15825; Mon, 12 Dec 1994 12:59:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 12:59:25 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199412121759.MAA15825@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: dave@corecom.com, tuba@lanl.gov
Subject: Re: status of tuba documents

> FOOBAR --> revised experimental RFC or submitted to FTP group for IPv6 

how about the 2nd (since the IPng AD's recommendation told them to look
at it)

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email