RE: redo the nSAP address allocation plans?
A.A.L.Reijnierse@research.ptt.nl Mon, 19 September 1994 09:39 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00971; 19 Sep 94 5:39 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00967; 19 Sep 94 5:39 EDT
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02143; 19 Sep 94 5:39 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id DAA06095; Mon, 19 Sep 1994 03:38:58 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id DAA23833; Mon, 19 Sep 1994 03:38:04 -0600
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id DAA23830; Mon, 19 Sep 1994 03:38:02 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: A.A.L.Reijnierse@research.ptt.nl
Received: from dnlts0.research.ptt.nl by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id DAA06069; Mon, 19 Sep 1994 03:37:55 -0600
Received: from alex (alex.research.ptt.nl) by research.ptt.nl (PMDF V4.3-11 #2928) id <01HHAMV9131C9YFFPG@research.ptt.nl>; Mon, 19 Sep 1994 11:39:07 +0200
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 1994 11:34:12 -0000
Subject: RE: redo the nSAP address allocation plans?
X-Orig-Sender: Alex Reijnierse <A.A.L.Reijnierse@research.ptt.nl>
To: wg-llt-clns@rare.nl, sn3plus-clns@surfnet.nl, ".Mailing list TUBA" <tuba@lanl.gov>
Message-id: <Chameleon.4.01.1.940919113845.reynier@alex>
X-Envelope-to: tuba@lanl.gov
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Chameleon - TCP/IP for Windows by NetManage, Inc.
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Hi Victor, >Hello all of you, > >I assume you already have seen the e-mails going over the IPng list >concerning the 16 octet IPv6 addresses, related to NSAP addresses. > >I am going to look into the possiblity to change my CLNS allocation >plan (I used upto 20 octets, and from what I know it must be reduced >to 15 octets [althought some people tell it is 16 octetc, but I think >that the first octet is needed of telling: 'this is an NSAPO >address']). > >What are the ideas of other people on this subject? Do they already >have concrete ideas about making the NSAP address space smaller (I >think, making it smaller is only needed when one thinks that it is in >future easier to transport CLNS over an IPv6 network). I have designed DCC and ICD NSAP structures for EMPB/EuropaNET that include 18 and 20 octets NSAPs respectively. The ICD NSAPs are not in use yet, the DCC NSAPs are. Upon request of EMPB i will try to create "light" :-) versions of these structures. - Alex ----------------------------------------------- Name: Alex Reijnierse Organisation: PTT Research Address: P.O. Box 421 2260 AK Leidschendam The Netherlands E-mail: A.A.L.Reijnierse@research.ptt.nl Date: 09/19/94 MIME OK! Time: 11:34:12 -----------------------------------------------
- RE: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? A.A.L.Reijnierse
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? A.A.L.Reijnierse
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? Juha Heinanen
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? Juha Heinanen
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? rcoltun
- Re: redo the nSAP address allocation plans? Juha Heinanen