Re: Comments on IPng choice

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu> Fri, 22 July 1994 15:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10368; 22 Jul 94 11:43 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10364; 22 Jul 94 11:43 EDT
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10199; 22 Jul 94 11:43 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id JAA06054; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 09:37:55 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id JAA10680; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 09:37:41 -0600
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id JAA10676; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 09:37:40 -0600
Received: from Mordor.Stanford.EDU by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id JAA05948; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 09:37:39 -0600
Received: from [128.102.17.23] by Mordor.Stanford.EDU (8.6.4/inc-1.0) id IAA28798; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 08:37:02 -0700
Message-Id: <aa5596cb0302101e3dad@[128.102.17.23]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 08:37:08 -0700
To: GHISELLI@infn.it
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Comments on IPng choice
Cc: J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, tuba@lanl.gov, big-interne@munnari.oz.au, hep-clns@frcpn11.in2p3.fr

Folks,

>Jon,
>actually we know this document, but what we have not understood is
>how the different IPng proposals have been evaluated versus the requirements.

I took the Mark/Peter note as a simple relaying of the basic decision from
the IPng ADs, rather than an attempt to represent it in any detail.

Clearly and obviously, the presentationat next week's IETF meeting will go
into the sort of detail that we ALL want to hear.

Let's wait until then?

d/


-----
Dave Crocker   <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
               +1 408 246 8253;  fax: +1 408 249 6205