IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on IPng choice

"Peter S. Ford" <peter@goshawk.lanl.gov> Fri, 22 July 1994 16:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10892; 22 Jul 94 12:09 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10888; 22 Jul 94 12:09 EDT
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11079; 22 Jul 94 12:09 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA14489; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:09:25 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id KAA11595; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:09:16 -0600
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1) id KAA11592; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:09:15 -0600
Received: from goshawk.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.6.8.1/1.2) id KAA14456; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:09:14 -0600
Received: from localhost.lanl.gov (localhost.lanl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by goshawk.lanl.gov (8.6.9/8.6.4) with SMTP id KAA04462; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:08:31 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Peter S. Ford" <peter@goshawk.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199407221608.KAA04462@goshawk.lanl.gov>
X-Authentication-Warning: goshawk.lanl.gov: Host localhost.lanl.gov didn't use HELO protocol
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
cc: GHISELLI@infn.it, J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, tuba@lanl.gov, big-interne@munnari.oz.au, hep-clns@frcpn11.in2p3.fr
Subject: Re: Comments on IPng choice
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 22 Jul 94 08:37:08 -0700. <aa5596cb0302101e3dad@[128.102.17.23]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:08:30 -0700


Dave,

We certainly all want to hear the details.  The fundamental issue that
Christina is illuminating is that there are many people who participate
in the IETF but have not been part of the IPng deliberations.
Documents, such as IDs,  detailing the rationale of the recommendations
would be a good way of further opening  up and engaging the overall
membership of the IETF.

My understanding is that such a document is forthcoming from the directorate.

Also, given the complexity of the topics being covered, for many (both
native and non-native english speakers) an electronic version  of the 
report may be preferable to an oral one.  It also helps
those people who will be unable to attend the Totonto meeting.


cheers, peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email