Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E5A3A0941 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmpTUd5VPgoS for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 761DD3A093E for <txauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id u6so1207921ljl.6 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=whjF0Ot05fF6HJxXnSvPUMGLiPg1ZfD/yebcMmy3tes=; b=FZaNCoO0HwmJ+6hXlXWnFoTWITNk535gsR0hUKmVPBY4yr0yMsF/eaW0lGQ6c6OIyh 5AkpxgMTp3/n606zPakcKBE61qTcZSPQvcyEqbZLcJXnZMCuNdxL8wmdaT4areAYFAyu 79hhmG/nriFyMwp1J6KZsn8pryANscwL3QI0OcEJQl5oq/6d3ZWcEk30OeivT2L5fP1c czO7tN13QqEw57q/3YtvjV4GWZMACSPOq/qLw53aK1GfxQ/OockCCCpr/6x5qLJ+mEor DXSK1Ad7JlSOssxPIx7nr6/WNinjHu51DP44PgF22OttPKq89S2hHP+dhE0bQgb21Tel AK7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=whjF0Ot05fF6HJxXnSvPUMGLiPg1ZfD/yebcMmy3tes=; b=E24u85WWDYGMlhjsQBQh/euwCVTejMjMnFJIASs9Zqom4rG6nsm5oUlaEUZBTc3koc Q0OYG6u7b/6Dkw+269TxYAaFdeh3y6Hhs8hQRDlfb+xPBcuqL4VZsFVIrL8QWQk4oQEr GrmFut8HJMflaYTv1XOyKV+G8dQyZ8WnJVx6MsobPjlSREtVscRF4Z1bktQb/isR0Yzz CqYgsVbfeI5nJKF7+ebiFIZcDmtWeVW82VAoYGpe7SYmiNO/SI9oKUW0RwiCKoiu03p6 8jJU2bKQljDNIC9EAQoLq59Whag7rg5q5XVUcH44ZmDzBPmSp14KvTua2LgGVEPOw/9M 232Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zggFygkPNWCpY2542EHAZ89F1YW67RYbYDF1DYd0zBsWd6XGa c0f1v10XFJ98lugdQyUXeorkhDpQhQPoJYn9gpdqf4Cl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsbLyVXreoF3zHGVv3cSfvE9FQL+7Sm2caS1jJRqUHLuA0z/Kba2KLkGDytCz9FrmAQsbPsU7R2uUa7XCi7uw=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:860a:: with SMTP id a10mr692150lji.20.1589405292137; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-v2TC+GFs-OCL2oMpjWmzHPJMKKmKSMxKNMqz1Y51Q5kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-tb4Oew88YNfqrgWeH0gD-cn9kL7SKHHbqTekQb3dc8ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-sd_7S=W-sBrxVkPjrxviEUWKuFf2UaBPFh8LEQHzqr3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHsNOKerUo-d9G87F5TdKWjdWURDzVmDsDc9LKUZDYt26mpGwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHsNOKerUo-d9G87F5TdKWjdWURDzVmDsDc9LKUZDYt26mpGwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:27:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-uw2sFwPwNOhCAuXvhtdK-6eAucZeHsgSq9oXvmF1Tj4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steinar Noem <steinar@udelt.no>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d78fac05a58e41c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/730pXJguwrj2rxhpcx5IalVusH8>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:28:18 -0000

Thanks for pointing that out Steiner. Agreed, CTAP is a conflict.
ᐧ

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:13 PM Steinar Noem <steinar@udelt.no> wrote:

> God morgen!
> The acronym CTAP is used by the Fido Alliance innit? (Client to
> Authenticator Protocol)
> It is an incredibly sexy name for a WG, but it might not be the best
> choice..
>
> tir. 12. mai 2020 kl. 22:50 skrev Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>om>:
>
>> In the poll, somehow I entered ZAuthZ instead of XAuthZ -- A dot for
>> ZAuthZ is really a dot for XAuthZ
>>
>> Apologies. Editing the poll creates a new link which seems even more
>> confusing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:44 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, so much for all the effort I did in sorting. The voting service
>>> randomizes the entries on each load ....
>>>
>>> Here is what is in the spreadsheet for your convenience ...
>>>
>>> abbrev pronunciation syllables WG Name
>>> PAuthZ paws 1 Protocol for Authorization
>>> AZARP a-zarp 2 AuthoriZed Access to Resources Protocol
>>> CTAP cee-tap 2 Comprehensive Token Access Protocol
>>> GNAP guh-nap 2 Grant Negotiation and Authorization Protocol
>>> GranPro gran-pro 2 GRAnt Negotiation Protocol
>>> NIRAD nir-ad 2 Negotiation of Intent Registration and Authority
>>> Delegation
>>> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Extension Auth
>>> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Extension Auth
>>> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Yield Auth
>>> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Yield Auth
>>> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Transference via Intent Extension Auth
>>> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Trust via Intent Extension Auth
>>> AAuthZ a-auth-zee 3 Alternative Authorization Protocol (AAuthZ)
>>> AZARAP az-a-rap 3 AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
>>> CompAuthZ comp-auth-zee 3 Componentized Authorization Protocol
>>> DAZARAP daz-a-rap 3 Delegated AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
>>> DisAuthZ dis-auth-zee 3 Dismembered Authorization Protocol
>>> ReAuthZ re-auth-z 3 Reimagined Authorization Protocol
>>> RefAuthZ ref-auth-z 3 Refactored Authorization Protocol
>>> TIARP t-i-arp 3 Tokenized Identity and Access Resource Protocol
>>> TINOA tin-o-a 3 This Is Not OAuth
>>> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Testable eXtensible Authorization
>>> TxAuth t-x-auth 3 Transmission of Authority
>>> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Truly eXtensible Authorization
>>> ZAuthZ x-auth-z 3 eXtensible authoriZation protocol
>>> BeBAuthZ be-be-auth-zee 4 Back-end Based Authorization Protocol
>>> CIOAuth cee-eye-o-auth 4 Client Intent Origin Auth
>>> BYOAuthZ be-y-o-auth-zee 5 Build-Your-Own Authorization Protocol
>>> CPAAP cee-pee-a-a-pee 5 Comprehensive Privileged Authentication
>>> Authorization Protocol
>>> DIYAuthZ dee-i-y-auth-zee 5 Do-It-Yourself Authorization Protocol
>>> IDPAuthZ i-dee-pee-auth-z 5 Intent Driven Protocol for Authorization
>>> TIAAP t-i-a-a-p 5 Tokenized Identity and Access Protocol
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Everyone
>>>>
>>>> We are now ready to do some dot voting
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-voting>
>>>>
>>>> We have 32 suggestions in the list Nigel managed
>>>> <https://nigelhamilton.com/pages/txauth-name-game.html> that did not
>>>> conflict with something else and were googlable.
>>>> (if your name did not make the list, neither did my XAuth suggestion!)
>>>>
>>>> If you feel strongly a name not in the list to be voted on should be
>>>> there, email me privately.
>>>>
>>>> I sorted the list based on shortishness (see below)
>>>>
>>>> Reminder, the expansion is the name of the working group, that will be
>>>> at top of this page https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/txauth/about/
>>>>
>>>> *Please goto this page to dot vote:*
>>>>
>>>> https://mindiply.com/products/decido/decisions/znxVEip81xOUjA
>>>>
>>>> *Please don't vote more than once!*
>>>>
>>>> If there is overwhelming support for one name, then we are done. If
>>>> not, then I'll cull the list and we will vote again.
>>>>
>>>> /Dick
>>>>
>>>> *Sorting Order*
>>>> I made my best guess on how I would pronounce the acronym/backronym,
>>>> and counted the syllables, as shortish was one of the selection criteria.
>>>>
>>>> The names are sorted by # syllables, alphabetical order of
>>>> abbreviation, then alphabetical order of WG name. The spreadsheet I used is
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N2vZY8xNjyAtvcY1PgVjY6ugxeUVSGoR98r2Nqu968c/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>> --
>> Txauth mailing list
>> Txauth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>
>
>
> --
> Vennlig hilsen
>
> Steinar Noem
> Partner Udelt AS
> Systemutvikler
>
> | steinar@udelt.no | hei@udelt.no  | +47 955 21 620 | www.udelt.no |
>