[GNAP] Weekly github digest (GNAP Weekly GitHub Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 09 May 2021 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7A03A20B7 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 01:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=q5ZX2KX/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=vIzAXpsH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOXicYPpsrob for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 01:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34E73A20B9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2021 01:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C7191A for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2021 03:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 May 2021 03:40:43 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm2; bh=w9+rmnVpw9l AXqcdlHerPl9Z0uea9ZD0bjynGBm278E=; b=q5ZX2KX/NlkJDbQXivE3hf3z0KA rhAd1AqlIlMjt8TMFYAKZLij3A6J1YkzgS44ladhIOtAZbhvFBCCR5p3446HXklJ iSS41UDbUH7xr5rNSO9cTkrY3TJqf18r936Mpcg/Ahj18BjNRvpCi80rs1+SS5Qa t/k7hx56wFfLfZAyH6IJsADX61AvMUCOnoklgQGiKNEKCMUFjKCGT0M9asPQD6Gq IAVomOHnx1KtW27DaKqywFY0rQePeOiRNEwXFlfqdZvG+C31rM4xU2KFj4jo0LxZ b1IqmNYjWTrVkkPgYZ9n6PGCfNoXOwhHdAxwIyNMuLTv+d96jKyq7Wsc+ag==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=w9+rmnVpw9lAXqcdlHerPl9Z0uea9ZD0bjynGBm278E=; b=vIzAXpsH /FD8tsd9oRcfnzEOf2CTKVsvfmrn13INozsEbgOUS6n7/aV0ye+RI2pZDr6fXpmb o6d0Zoz7Nvp0QCNZqPel2QZVA3qMx7aqJq1xvetlRDN/8TizSP0pcE0jSS5SDH3K Aji2M6BHP+4fqeqGufOsd23sVy0cfwuLWj81bJ4TzHWeffpbfAp4KogqjgGYN4/8 baTOhHvd8IB2YG4c26SZ55See9OXS1T8KVagan4kq9QVB2uYToxMoykOdE5m/xpI Ni+0CzgtYw/oEnxihLpA8HdHBasqak7ThjnckWQTwr/O/3WCj3mc14x68MF/a5GQ cWMn6O4LRN1YFA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-5GXYIVXro9JDQKjGwBuD1IfLlNGkmy3yucP-bULLpWC0PNbF6V5NQ> <xme:-5GXYMndbhz2WW9p4jR7JPex1ILxIsDla1GiMTfiplaFCxGOgiBhtCAAeWY2SxLvS cI5hj0f7yy2apjgUw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeghedguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecukfhppedvtddrudekhedrkeekrdduiedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep feenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhoth drnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-5GXYMZcI3FZ1FJwgFhVZKtC3LKhA3WqdbS-oVtnBgQkMmXARyiUWw> <xmx:-5GXYHXQ03CQIbbMjqIw8A1W4EHjICbm09kr6Bxnyt6jTZx48BwPXg> <xmx:-5GXYCmkmDVfwMUK7Weq99-g6nzjA23n_eUWx90EFduNKayc4aTudw> <xmx:-5GXYGuVBgH49VJEgmasU4LjHROzmALrAArohkeX4w0ndkybtYv6_g>
Received: from fv-az154-953.kzav01uq0i3u1f1hch3ggm0mbb.bx.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [20.185.88.161]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2021 03:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1819254188690117535=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: txauth@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210509081602.F34E73A20B9@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 01:16:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/DuwixNFlvOcU5i1Hy5iTGp_NTfI>
Subject: [GNAP] Weekly github digest (GNAP Weekly GitHub Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 08:16:09 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* ietf-wg-gnap/core-protocol (+1/-0/💬4)
  1 issues created:
  - Add an "implementation status" section (by yaronf)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/258 

  3 issues received 4 new comments:
  - #257 Format of defining REQUIRED vs OPTIONAL request/response elements (1 by tplooker)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/257 [Editorial] 
  - #221 DID as identifier (2 by agropper, fimbault)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/221 [Needs Text] 
  - #168 message based interaction / DIDComm (1 by agropper)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/168 

* ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers (+9/-2/💬6)
  9 issues created:
  - Section 2.3.4 should be normative (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/10 
  - Capabilities only (i.e. actions) are supported. ACLs (i.e. attributes associated with a subject) should also be supported  (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/9 
  - A model where the AS and the RS do not need to establish a prior relation relationship should be able to co-exist (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/8 
  - Trust relationships between a RS and an AS (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/7 
  - The text should say when the RS SHALL respond to the client with an authentication header indicating an error (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/6 
  - The privacy drawbacks when implementing an introspection service should be mentioned (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/5 
  - Calls from a RS to an AS are optional (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/4 
  - Token formats can also be advertised both by AS and RS (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/3 
  - The Abstract and the Introduction should be aligned (by Denisthemalice)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/2 

  6 issues received 6 new comments:
  - #10 Section 2.3.4 should be normative (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/10 
  - #8 A model where the AS and the RS do not need to establish a prior relation relationship should be able to co-exist (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/8 
  - #7 Trust relationships between a RS and an AS (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/7 
  - #6 The text should say when the RS SHALL respond to the client with an authentication header indicating an error (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/6 
  - #5 The privacy drawbacks when implementing an introspection service should be mentioned (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/5 
  - #4 Calls from a RS to an AS are optional (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/4 

  2 issues closed:
  - Section 2.3.4 should be normative https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/10 
  - Calls from a RS to an AS are optional https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/4 




Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/core-protocol
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers