[GNAP] Editorial update

Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Fri, 02 April 2021 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE423A36C7 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DhqSjzuirq7W for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859A23A36C8 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id k8so2164238iop.12 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xPD1RLpnR8Eob9sqZ1zjmAIKa/ytmtRUS36XdbhUl0A=; b=CCcLQSP0/Qi/ltz6WkRr5ZEcsm83Xm/+oFDQfosT0B1rUS9gqJu3VuwKT3M9t5//EQ LZTE7cL2dMnM74a6yui/H9ClUcjVxXplYhRE72CP81V1jB6+/iin8Xfpqp4XoryCmJZL cKWGMwKERGfqPE5C0HCf8hko19TAG69pel5G0T80J9F5CYKPtfM/2Y+sVA9c94NJZ0fg UzBG8eZqC4YyGZXFOsg+hE+ha3OGVVofpvoUjdDYOijz0JlpbXnX9dPdD2Hd7A35u0uh gmFX/e7K0UHo4bLmkLxE1c1DdW/EAbQt5I/MrOG2/p4zZLuqilVp/OX4YSuTFeW4lchC oC0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xPD1RLpnR8Eob9sqZ1zjmAIKa/ytmtRUS36XdbhUl0A=; b=iRqe3nlJPAuFOru6ba+i6ZZxufm1GF7hau5S+304jXid0I1gzJPW3nz+qA7avvgfMO gz72PP35Xs5IDGnyyahbWRdk/TrIllUqzK3aN6CuFzGBPBVH8puLzRy0NMXRbdup8usf g+UnLakXAFtqilgsen+9HlZ+C5Kf7vHwwtliW62WHWSC7TrN2PoNAD4rJqIoMNWZ/lnK uIXN80lVymKrUo5j2sAa2V5DgvjLbQwLn2YPEPe8vFVxitYiZTG8NIjacPNS0VnvTxBW 7GDVoYeIIbDXBGWPIibLgJ/LJiSeI1YnWHW2Rfrx59lWwVcBU4T9AC9eV6Fs9cgFuELd /SYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yq3jYuZcTcuTx69H5mW6ZkXYsz1Mn6C/vI7GKL46umq4+p+EB PNKsf4z2aE0dzRe42OmeLgT/bodA/ZM5BnSgN4BmiF922snDxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8/mbA9O+zGCRzxygJp+5h/kZxTIylpuBoaIIviCdhOHseYaKPkQZEySyFiKUOnCcCY08jhal/x4t/uiNLFS8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:224e:: with SMTP id m14mr12062004jas.8.1617348819854; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:33:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CAM8feuR5RN1=CBWrr09qUk9ULXZPLwE24Gb-PrqnpX_=p4Jwrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2a8ee05bef85dee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/ECYCkuYxgbco_jE8hIzBo9ZwLSQ>
Subject: [GNAP] Editorial update
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:33:44 -0000

Hi everyone,

Here's the summary of the last editorial review of issues and PRs. As
usual, please comment in the coming week.

*PRs now pending merge:*
- Change subject type to format to comply with secevent draft07
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/220

- The "typ" parameter for jws and jwsd key proofing mechanisms
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/226
Please note that this PR raised a new issue #231 on the verification side.

- Replacing email by opaque in examples
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/228

*PRs pending close:*
- Replace parameter "ts" by "iat" for jws and jwsd key proofing mechanisms
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/227
Please note that there's on-going discussion on the name to be used.

*Update on issues :*
-  paramaters x5c and x5t#S256 and GNAP key formats is pending close
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/222

- Definition of a Subject in section 1.3 is pending close
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/198

- DID as identifier is need text
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/221
As an exception, the editors won't apply the one week period on this
substantive item. But we would need some contributions to get forward.

Cheers
Justin, Aaron and Fabien