IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Vijay IETF <vijay.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368C03A12E4 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObzIaTfM9lqM for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB7F3A12E1 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id f82so2689640ilh.8 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6jVSGS+oJW1VQw94ZfPWVjf+R3Lljt0jHUa/X5cqqM4=; b=N+9zc4lkEH9Vllomdl1t6bqIgMAnIHO+/DbQWFV+JXL2vKascXbpLEv0qqliI83dQ0 YTvqihxmzPYjrOYw1C4F5z8njx8K305uSpyhIlrb/in/+1pFNty+BxPNK+JNx1F8B6st rrtip6bOW/3MYUfRDNNNRkz+WB/cxcM+Tyvnb+jwrA6kLWaR3AmFWoFCTZp23CXaYyVP BR1ZWZnQL/bg7glR5BQnDXTA6nrR5Tbn9/P10gp/+5T+mdWfh2NsG6vTkbbBddOcA5/P I20a1/p/+K+QB9yQ92elEZoAxEezpPoryLrkO0zFZySLLqRD+ScGUkMVPM0WTCCEWAsG Z6gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6jVSGS+oJW1VQw94ZfPWVjf+R3Lljt0jHUa/X5cqqM4=; b=UCNm6GZGOzWji1HXGfTVhNuhdgTd7ZsGcCIQ3/CZsx69OtqDsMHJYIUVFuCgXuLBXt OTNBYt60AIRplPo4LE2uOGpyJ3gZGX9+9kmhxM3rCEhpDLbk0WleFV1yXCK2QQaAEHSd 8zT4TrKNYd4AxhB3/YV6xCzLLFnN00vLHFRKDESTKL2Eysn5npa4gtl/+UFCKPmvcyIA IvgBgOCCZOHAbwtcxFmHQOEr7WrOsDmQI2eRgau6eErsQMjomacHVU6twHp9yu9+9nKc y/DMbbCCdULN3OzVYUyJT/E+pbhWznKcNdJ8ttZUa8DkknVKWu5ee1B8jFd9Jk2CSfSd sbJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaR9LgLYwhcj9xONgEYQKtIx2yeU67FiHqfcM8VuFUqYHyqHf9T Yhs2sZ/gGEl9EbGyVxAeUUsi0SFdkFDmX3kTzOI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJPYCZKz6p60xJzglbPiJgsA6R990kLk8eGcPRoqmUs4OCiEnweZAYdqJsmGTgXNYesQFK9m7W2zdMcv8ykcEQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8c08:: with SMTP id o8mr222382ild.123.1588279513422; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com> <9938e1eb-c4d8-d842-d32f-3aac86f123eb@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v3sFuVbYJphPQAAeJQJZmOJGLfu-18sUywzN=n_Z70-g@mail.gmail.com> <0064DFB4-0521-4621-B3F4-780FDC4B1CDE@gmail.com> <A0E885A1-A86D-4323-B874-B6C25BBF5EC8@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <A0E885A1-A86D-4323-B874-B6C25BBF5EC8@mit.edu>
From: Vijay IETF <vijay.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 02:15:01 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEADenkvssrR0GuGgTMNWy2h1xeek4fEB5ebAw+gHM77r8KM+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>, txauth@ietf.org, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033a19305a48824f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/MOjkKYjBEIzER3oI_H9Ou5kPUNY>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:45:17 -0000

You meant "Federation Using Cryptographic Keys" of course. Why still carry
the remnants of the king?
Goes well with "Information Technology". I like it :-)

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 21:10, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:

> +1. We should avoid things that we are *aware* are offensive somewhere.
> Our knowledge will not be universal, but having the “Federation Under
> Cryptographic Keys” protocol would be a bad call. :)
>
>  — Justin
>
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:31 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If someone in the working group finds it offensive, it is. Not very
> scientific but IMO good enough.
>
> *From: *Txauth <txauth-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dick Hardt <
> dick.hardt@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 21:12
> *To: *Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
> *Cc: *<txauth@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
>
> But which languages are we checking? There are alot in the world. The
> phonetics of the name could be offensive -- ie it could be an offensive
> word when said in China or Japan. I don't know how to use google to
> search phonetics.
> [image: Image removed by sender.]ᐧ
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:01 AM Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> wrote:
>
> Am 28.04.20 um 19:54 schrieb Dick Hardt:
>
> Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious which
> languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is impractical.
> A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than language specific..
> For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very different than a fag in
> the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual man).
>
> If it is in the Urban Dictionary, it is probably a bad choice ;-)
> No, seriously, I guess we can just google for "<x> definition", "<x>
> translation" and see what comes up.
> -Daniel
>
>
> -- Txauth mailing list Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
>
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email