Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DE23A0B2B for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7tYKBvbhL8X for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C859C3A0B05 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id b26so11750312lfa.5 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4YYcMg9criAU4G3aFVdRFQlLABeIMtcriV3AacfQZso=; b=HSEFSoQ2e9NcLenZdJGOzGddw1f6snZv5ZTdrjNEIRVjBGzd4ylia2FWo4Opkb6Hnu eCe5Q4NxGcYQYTiAYYgDXsVmuSCspuWWqj4zDBqbC2HQ/wZSmSHdvUbPBuGqAd7+xhaf dUkYWZKP0tUAk6L2ub2jH5tJLsD3iyAQ5f0G+SBAA3icUYubDxBa1Aqy/6aAYZuVnHOn XxUl7LrPeLxgAP0g5nJgUHrfB3G1QhqMdtzDBXtqBWvWjyl+rlIyrr68ehkd3mRFWyXp vNthCrUaLuf3yHgfc8Ex6pB1UHJaEJxQSwUnyUi0yGeEeM2YvrvQDA/sunGiniH7youW DsRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4YYcMg9criAU4G3aFVdRFQlLABeIMtcriV3AacfQZso=; b=Lrmx6taEcVq8ZHXZiEEXjcyJifoi0CC1AbNEZMxzeCH3sqRhctlhT/Gt3uqe+x88pU nnDHqkUwNGWoQCha6oXTuJ/myspTSIFY9q7+bYvI5TaDw8b61auYmMes7BpH7ZpZWumn iKsAjgqd63fJT5u4/552AV3uUEr9DWBVR2w/RwGO+vKBqSdj92skd9pm5O87OPcQNhnV EE9bxHPx5bDbDjoWhxlE65Z+AD0r5QITmgVVRO8bh2gTj8fX15ofnaqkqeq5V92dN6Bm HjxYxvV0rexeohjrwxbHHgVzyK3Yg9N33FVb4Vd+WY3URG8Bo5XZjXC+xYrxHZ7DX5IS hVTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lrVPvK0P4i1yz+mEoEVLEFPb/1IiGm5q0C/7aodQWDjJyF8Oh wYZwvATR79GHPk0C/JfpIqPwHLGW7MkdncYz6B8Zj7Hl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2VCc8KlFCE6zWKTvCi7sftSuWjH+4T6q4N3cn+nBI9XKEcff1Inf5kxn9L26kV0KFp9qDrQF6lT3Q+06iC7Q=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5059:: with SMTP id a25mr16450768lfm.78.1589316624295; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-v2TC+GFs-OCL2oMpjWmzHPJMKKmKSMxKNMqz1Y51Q5kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-tb4Oew88YNfqrgWeH0gD-cn9kL7SKHHbqTekQb3dc8ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-tb4Oew88YNfqrgWeH0gD-cn9kL7SKHHbqTekQb3dc8ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:49:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-sd_7S=W-sBrxVkPjrxviEUWKuFf2UaBPFh8LEQHzqr3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d3ab8705a5799ccc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/RXDaxZIJTHNgLk22CkU3q3j1YbQ>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 20:50:29 -0000

In the poll, somehow I entered ZAuthZ instead of XAuthZ -- A dot for ZAuthZ
is really a dot for XAuthZ

Apologies. Editing the poll creates a new link which seems even more
confusing.



On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:44 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, so much for all the effort I did in sorting. The voting service
> randomizes the entries on each load ...
>
> Here is what is in the spreadsheet for your convenience ...
>
> abbrev pronunciation syllables WG Name
> PAuthZ paws 1 Protocol for Authorization
> AZARP a-zarp 2 AuthoriZed Access to Resources Protocol
> CTAP cee-tap 2 Comprehensive Token Access Protocol
> GNAP guh-nap 2 Grant Negotiation and Authorization Protocol
> GranPro gran-pro 2 GRAnt Negotiation Protocol
> NIRAD nir-ad 2 Negotiation of Intent Registration and Authority Delegation
> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Extension Auth
> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Extension Auth
> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Yield Auth
> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Yield Auth
> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Transference via Intent Extension Auth
> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Trust via Intent Extension Auth
> AAuthZ a-auth-zee 3 Alternative Authorization Protocol (AAuthZ)
> AZARAP az-a-rap 3 AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
> CompAuthZ comp-auth-zee 3 Componentized Authorization Protocol
> DAZARAP daz-a-rap 3 Delegated AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
> DisAuthZ dis-auth-zee 3 Dismembered Authorization Protocol
> ReAuthZ re-auth-z 3 Reimagined Authorization Protocol
> RefAuthZ ref-auth-z 3 Refactored Authorization Protocol
> TIARP t-i-arp 3 Tokenized Identity and Access Resource Protocol
> TINOA tin-o-a 3 This Is Not OAuth
> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Testable eXtensible Authorization
> TxAuth t-x-auth 3 Transmission of Authority
> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Truly eXtensible Authorization
> ZAuthZ x-auth-z 3 eXtensible authoriZation protocol
> BeBAuthZ be-be-auth-zee 4 Back-end Based Authorization Protocol
> CIOAuth cee-eye-o-auth 4 Client Intent Origin Auth
> BYOAuthZ be-y-o-auth-zee 5 Build-Your-Own Authorization Protocol
> CPAAP cee-pee-a-a-pee 5 Comprehensive Privileged Authentication
> Authorization Protocol
> DIYAuthZ dee-i-y-auth-zee 5 Do-It-Yourself Authorization Protocol
> IDPAuthZ i-dee-pee-auth-z 5 Intent Driven Protocol for Authorization
> TIAAP t-i-a-a-p 5 Tokenized Identity and Access Protocol
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone
>>
>> We are now ready to do some dot voting
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-voting>
>>
>> We have 32 suggestions in the list Nigel managed
>> <https://nigelhamilton.com/pages/txauth-name-game.html> that did not
>> conflict with something else and were googlable.
>> (if your name did not make the list, neither did my XAuth suggestion!)
>>
>> If you feel strongly a name not in the list to be voted on should be
>> there, email me privately.
>>
>> I sorted the list based on shortishness (see below)
>>
>> Reminder, the expansion is the name of the working group, that will be at
>> top of this page https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/txauth/about/
>>
>> *Please goto this page to dot vote:*
>>
>> https://mindiply.com/products/decido/decisions/znxVEip81xOUjA
>>
>> *Please don't vote more than once!*
>>
>> If there is overwhelming support for one name, then we are done. If not,
>> then I'll cull the list and we will vote again.
>>
>> /Dick
>>
>> *Sorting Order*
>> I made my best guess on how I would pronounce the acronym/backronym, and
>> counted the syllables, as shortish was one of the selection criteria.
>>
>> The names are sorted by # syllables, alphabetical order of abbreviation,
>> then alphabetical order of WG name. The spreadsheet I used is here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N2vZY8xNjyAtvcY1PgVjY6ugxeUVSGoR98r2Nqu968c/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>