IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] Terminology PR

Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447B3A0F0A for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:02:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sg2Zi4UulDZB for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1E63A0FC3 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:01:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id m23so3219541ioy.2 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 08:01:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YoNBSjtLtKbjXk8nuAyeDfi1u7Z2xu2B2pOPSfs3xKM=; b=NHSAcBJ+wlsh8CAD9O9uoxBb+fo8/wLsvmNpg1YcT0tZzn1PuDOidET93GCpF1bbwV yN8fVJjQ4F541aJiOltKZvoQYlfe8+Xu6nRiIXdVQsq8e1wETUA6oOfjVDzthTruVaPF GQ8/vJu2whWImSqX9Ga5IaG+IDanjGMYzSjHr6bJiACplhKa0AN/qdsXuDIbgo+ApW9l y484h4ObfrSQxYtlwvf2gcYQNXWUuiSIsrbN4wX9RXuj0aF4kBWHa+c7nHcQknyW0dCf n+lawsI3NjnwogWjcm6FAZIqlpoKoQ+bg7Nxj5U+8VkX0S7Grwa5hoYlKxmVEfqEKupH oWkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YoNBSjtLtKbjXk8nuAyeDfi1u7Z2xu2B2pOPSfs3xKM=; b=qlTBaREfUr8c1X7hYpjuHVpPFpNMob05godzPtdZxQsZK8UKi1QwwnId5EBuHSQcKL RQiYwRwxlz/YLR88BNens313vlg61THG4vo4Yz5dcjH2Vg2IKFMVvmFV4qLkv1HBDVMP 9PcByjwW4k2FUfsrriyfum2C7pgo2qoinsVj1hlq9aLZ0aisby/oLr2ICEArcMRGEGdR 0xkOAhkmdqlesoTu/4TYGo1OfWqMkPArT5rZEQySbFQW66w8FUGyC0WBK9YvBYQ4/7g5 3NdJTrbKvUJnq/9nTFVcGlok0b9CSR8G8oh2sTKjuT9XMA8Q/M2dTFgTg1DYcZQ2nOTA zdHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VrWUTUgbd3zUVVnyLJbRqc8Spi4hMUFk0dykVbmF4nCKe1wuD qxisBSsGJO69d/+S0zGyC8hNVenbx07iMH17Enc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXaSsvCQ9tPvOqtmL7GhuBgnMKg34ZtCrCaBddgtVpK1I+Pa/yIDK/QCE4U2T8mjs0sNQOw7Oq5K4PpsNbUN8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:a916:: with SMTP id c22mr3313748iod.144.1609948909898; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 08:01:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM8feuQyd6o_7zcs_O1KEbFkni1-c8BGdC57vQbukgVYavE5-Q@mail.gmail.com> <DAB2E8D3-DC9F-4502-8D6E-5BE2066AEF88@openconsent.com> <CAM8feuSaSeiSe7_T8BGEyQYDAd3PvUa-uO-rEDLcZPkos7KPbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8feuSaSeiSe7_T8BGEyQYDAd3PvUa-uO-rEDLcZPkos7KPbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:01:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8feuSdMNRstXpbGLpzsH39HL4k5H+03iUe1oAScP+zSWgppA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Lizar <mark@openconsent.com>
Cc: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e190a005b83d70e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/SIcztrqGjyYkw9fBYJh0F8qWw00>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] Terminology PR
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:02:22 -0000

Hi everyone,

I've committed some changes (based on the useful comments made on the PR,
from Justin), visible in the PR itself or on the wiki.

Cheers
Fabien

The generation of the html doesn't work on a forked project, because the
netlify token doesn't match.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:20 PM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> The original requirement for "subject" comes from the reference to
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secevent-subject-identifiers-06
> (used in the main text). The objective was to try to avoid various terms
> which are synonyms.
>
> You're right, it's close to a legal entity, except from the fact that it
> is defined more broadly (person, organization or device), which is
> something we can encounter for the RO for instance.
>
> For instance we had previous discussions where the RO was defined as :
> "personal or organizational entity"
> which I replaced in the latest draft by
> "subject entity" (since it is defined)
>
> For "Subject Information", the question whether this refers to the
> end-user or the RO is currently left open.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Cheers
> Fabien
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:38 PM Mark Lizar <mark@openconsent.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fabien,  et al,
>>
>> Great start!!
>>
>> Could you clarify the use and application of the term subject, as the
>> term is used in some legal standards for semantics and I wonder if this is
>> related to the legal semantic attribution of data subject.
>>
>> In the glossary,  it also seems the Subject Entity is referring to what
>> is commonly know as legal entity.   And the term subject can refer to a few
>> things at this technical level.— e.g.  a semantic term referencing in
>> general the *topic* of the resource  or is it the* legal entity
>> / credential *that corresponds to the accountable controller of a
>> resource ?
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On 5 Jan 2021, at 08:04, Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I wish you all a happy new year.
>>
>> I just created a PR (
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/155) that takes
>> into account the various feedbacks. The automatic build process is not
>> working, but you can see the diffs and build the html locally if you
>> prefer. The definitions have also been updated on the wiki (
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/wiki/Terminology) if
>> you prefer to check there.
>>
>> Feedbacks welcome before we move to pending merge later on.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Fabien
>> --
>> TXAuth mailing list
>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email