IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] Another process comment - section numbers in issues

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2020 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E2C3A0D95 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TcoQVBMA8lph for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0203A0D9A for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id c17so11784505wrc.11 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=XTs7wEfJddcUHCkSppDQLZjmikAARZXluj4DC22fDfI=; b=Z793fjRUa16T/XvFtaJtyj5LpJMeAwf0CsNWyazAwvlbm6+DGtb4OLyetixXWbI5Qz bo+sxHy8g6q7rFjk1wFdO5zWT2xyjiL65zOQeF/k0h8tBhaDFy8nq8jZZzKwLzpBs8HL E9AEzPyLKsF0znw3pwXVFc7LljOFis8R+1ImxRhW3EQevN5bvY1A6UH54n0GaVnbb0s+ sxWxDNSakX00jN8rp4lxndqXQXRcO8qkwiljo0CwNM9UiM/jv5shktZ/We/w0V8aG7yA Gy+AwVXLVyt4m6t3dhSiURLFVd4KtXbYS/IPGj45e+bo1A1Gm5626r1rrxlcYEQClDb4 eviw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=XTs7wEfJddcUHCkSppDQLZjmikAARZXluj4DC22fDfI=; b=sqxxH4Z+Z8fSdm5cdWDnpUE8iehsTxCy55nbbL281LBRTlVCAmw1SBVXipd8elDxBl hDf6NG/iXGGs/upsSHciqzEQlt8BaA+lPbTb5fBXS6MOtDHNAUOwD3fuaD7/ITMGm69k oK1VycVymQBofyjsJ6fotjzZPqKXnjprGrNaOi4T+sJXG/6PRev+vr+wipmbwgmlBX8x kGOf2aYuorVsk+1fLHqoDiUY0rTS1Xzedkss4VY9aZkkxRXVHYndEaqOJ7BN4Bh5u6Ep krh7dKy10MsfmRLlzP293nrpa0smTInydzwppLViebU4lPhhTfv+Ak2NtkpytLlbFiiv /fbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531R2Q5eiOmLLODRmF3/RilGq8E2jt8SSxLCZzR0I66FDL4hshFq GvOtd47gx63iNL1iKrkF+MI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8a3dqbynO7+r8l4tfLr1GXblBKuBCLK98jp+zWuvVhGWDhr4598evfb+Q0Cbq8nlVxcbYdw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5701:: with SMTP id a1mr5976080wrv.120.1605306341773; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.68.107] (bzq-79-176-32-148.red.bezeqint.net. [79.176.32.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm12045032wrq.47.2020.11.13.14.25.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:25:41 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:25:40 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
CC: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <087811AB-E85E-4B78-BB8C-E136905514BB@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [GNAP] Another process comment - section numbers in issues
References: <664DC2D5-350A-4795-AC15-18EBA7CB4D25@gmail.com> <CAM8feuRsS86D4ObzAh8Y2-NgFhZ_z5MYc86o4hRGmsMf7MVV=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8feuRsS86D4ObzAh8Y2-NgFhZ_z5MYc86o4hRGmsMf7MVV=A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3688158340_443472712"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/Y4XH1t6lAMNtCDmkZV-v4ptzFQQ>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] Another process comment - section numbers in issues
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:25:47 -0000

Hi Fabien,

 

I would quote the full text of the section title, instead of its number. Ugly but practical.

 

Thanks,

                Yaron

 

From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, November 13, 2020 at 18:51
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] Another process comment - section numbers in issues

 

Hi Yaron, 

 

That's right, but we need to find a way to identify where the issue is located. 

For editor's notes, Justin has worked in the other direction : issues are refered from the spec itself.  

But we might not want to change the spec each time we have an issue, so I don't know what's the best solution here.

 

Cheers

Fabien

 

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:56 PM Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi everyone, editors in particular,

 

I suggest not to use section numbers in issues, because they obviously change over time, moreover, if we use section numbers, we have a strong incentive to keep them from one version to the next and it's way too early for that.

 

Thanks,

                Yaron

-- 
TXAuth mailing list
TXAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email