IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] physical person

Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52DE3A0E6E for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:54:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rj1uZXvyPnLa for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5663A1200 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 9so12503239oiq.3 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:53:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bRMPZqNveE34G5xfJl3FJyI1PWG/0XeYJ9vqqK++C5I=; b=bPnDfd+MyJ/yfEd9gUg9+5vht3RLrGs/IW5f8borw0Dc2WTpkuoBcMPPLuTSVkyTKk w0RIA3E+xu8joqaDLDxQushXXfOj1QpqKYwGkHL52pLV1EtfaYWMK8MPLeaBu1fQ5yu4 43oWAsvpanQnusNDCAldoj+/Xtx0JwrKgEtxrAo4eBCMlZKjdWYSwmTteX7Fwbgqnpbk r+LHY0vtudUickxd5HXgYHb+rK6j4PU6nKwcpYNv1LFJ4CnM45SYdJH/tud1Fk7rmD+z PuGksGRYxy8cpItVPRuxUdhs0Rn6Q0ZvUU/ASBLBjIWZSTTgQDxkggiJJjgiuu45QVpc 3gPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bRMPZqNveE34G5xfJl3FJyI1PWG/0XeYJ9vqqK++C5I=; b=TpSaEYtM8WHiZFW+pAma7znjU3+t1j0Y6SE96+pVX/dD3IKyGiSB6Pgk34APIPOsIp f2oE2plaE6DPB0Uqmg7Lhf5ucuWFHPKQg0x0SvDWScBeYHJ1o5d151rPfSOys0DX/Hhw jlB7FnOzqJbjBLX3ou6m20MtYdZ3yNsnNQMB9kypQnMyJlhD+Z8rP2qWWs7E+MdGzhaP Y/wUFeCuN/tHW/oJTTo9xLAQjlrgZHNFsqynxAn13uNcMinrpYDHCSU+FRkr+1AIwenn 06K3Bov4ElcNxn4w5uKxheSV0AViJXgZmqaVZNplVEVl+tv5U5WM4bDNcsWniL6ewxf4 g+Pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iKccWDsKBmA6CiekKbF8A32PPc6n/ogxnK1oBShDKK37ukOAL 8Qe95+vOYI4ZsdBeqW5Hg7YC1gP8GdrJxzw0YtE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNg0oUv5ypkyNwIcvG/ajTUpO/YqKpAeE0gzZOQ6fiuq6lCZEkFkOd4QLfr1LhNunp0rjO5FjLysh55oMIIYI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1109:: with SMTP id 9mr19270471oir.131.1607961215896; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:53:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK2Cwb4KGs05pRJ6AbmJx3Tc6t7NUTABccC1VALLcuJxonYoqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuRtTzueUSTMFBGNfqaYDpHm=7GAdEKaCBDQSkeHuu-OFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOthoTk4fu4Vut9ad7E79MZMy6vKYXUtuY=1zFi7SAPuWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuQEwKXLdc6i6ez_TXLxfSsRuh=wYpfiTHXd=sMmHdWX1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAK2Cwb7PXZybz59b=yj+knGE=hzEtXm1NfO+PREMpU+WEHRk6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOv1GQ_SJyHE4RboPCoLiivgvY+5TDjJ7CqzCj5gyGT+Jg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuSADSs2OwZprdyJnd5bK_td7Yo9mQOAg-ja8zRpGux8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8feuSADSs2OwZprdyJnd5bK_td7Yo9mQOAg-ja8zRpGux8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:53:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2Cwb6M8fRK0Sma-R+jp9ovRiEyZdwC3J5Rhj0S1tVUtRo5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>, GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016126705b66ea58c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/Z-nWVy2dvJh505WaYTUtAh0YiYU>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] physical person
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:54:08 -0000

Either sounds good to me.

thx ..Tom (mobile)

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 12:57 AM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for your inputs, we can try to update the definition of RO
> using "entity".
>
> Currently we have : person acting on its own or representing an
> organization, that may grant privileges on resources he has authority upon
>
> Alternative 1 : personal or organizational entity that may grant
> privileges on resources it has authority upon
> Alternative 2 : entity that may grant privileges on resources it has
> authority upon
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers
> Fabien
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree.
>> --
>> -jim
>> Jim Willeke
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:31 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> agree w/ Fabien on that point.  My own preference would be to call the
>>> RO an entity, which means a named object.
>>> Peace ..tom
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:23 PM Fabien Imbault <
>>> fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> For end user at least, we wanted to convey that it is a real person.
>>>>
>>>> The case is different for the RO, indeed here person would be enough I
>>>> believe.
>>>>
>>>> Fabien
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le dim. 13 déc. 2020 à 21:20, Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> A natural person is usually implied to be a Human Being.
>>>>> As in jurisprudence, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted
>>>>> only to Natural Persons.
>>>>>
>>>>> A person or entity seems to be more appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -jim
>>>>> Jim Willeke
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:44 PM Fabien Imbault <
>>>>> fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wasn't thinking about that, but yes.
>>>>>> Natural person would be good. I change it in the wiki.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thxs
>>>>>> Fabien
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Tom Jones <
>>>>>> thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I dislike this. A robot can be a physical person. What's wrong with
>>>>>>> natural person that others use?
>>>>>>> Peace ..tom
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email