Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!

[Dick Hardt <[e-mail]>]

FYI: we have moved past brainstorming and are now voting!!! :)

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:09 PM Mike Jones <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Web Resource Access Collaboration (WRAC)
>
>
>
> *From:* Txauth <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Brian Campbell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2020 12:38 PM
> *To:* Dick Hardt <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* Jared Jennings <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!
>
>
>
> I always thought WRAP (Web Resource Authorization Protocol) was a good
> name. Perhaps a riff on that? Like WRAC, pronounced "rack", that expands to
> Web Resource Authorization Concord (or Compact or Convention).
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32 AM Dick Hardt <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Ok
>
>
>
> FYI: The working group does need a name to go with the charter.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:29 AM Jared Jennings <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I wasn't really thinking of expanding the name. I'm not really a fan
> of it though and don't mind if it's not included. I had provided several
> others over the weekend.
>
>
>
> Personally, I am going to vote on OAuth 3.0 and maybe XAuth.
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 12, 2020, at 09:27, Dick Hardt <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Im looking for the phrase it expands to, and not wanting to assume what
> Jared was proposing.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:24 AM Justin Richer <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> I could be wrong, but I believe the intended expansion is “EdgeAuth” as
> stated in the email below. Or are you looking to expand “Edge” as an
> acronym as well?
>
>
>
>  — Justin
>
>
>
> On May 11, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Dick Hardt <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jared: to have your suggestion be listed, you will need to provide an
> expansion on the name of the WG.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:39 AM Jared Jennings <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> EdgeAuth or EAuth - something along those lines.
>
>
> -Jared
>
> Skype:jaredljennings
>
> Signal:+1 816.730.9540
>
> WhatsApp: [phone]
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:09 PM Dick Hardt <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> We now have our criteria for names, and we can now start the next step in
> our process, brainstorming names!
>
>
>
> Here is the criteria again:
>
>
>
> Required:
>
>    1. No confusion with another protocol, major software project, or
>    IETF/IRTF WG name
>    2. no existing registered trademarks in related classes
>    3. Less than 1M results in Google
>    4. Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
>    5. Not an offensive meaning to a member of the mail list
>
> Desirable:
>
>    1. Straightforward to pronounce
>    2. Easy to spell
>    3. Easy to read
>    4. Shortish
>
> We won't be judging or ranking names at this time -- we are brainstorming
> names that are descriptive of the protocol.
>
> We are hoping we can get the WG approved in the telechat May 21,
>
> so ideally we would have r*ough consensus on the name by May 18.*
>
>
>
> Let's brainstorm for a week, and then we can stack rank them on our
> objective criteria, and then vote on the top candidates.
>
>
>
> I'll start by submitting my favorite:
>
>
>
> XAuth - Extensible delegated Authorization and Authentication protocol, or
> just view the X as a placeholder and XAuth is OAuth ++
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from
> your computer. Thank you.*
>