IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] physical person

Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> Sun, 13 December 2020 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BCA3A0B56 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcrG9gQLwgTM for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 516CC3A0B55 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q205so4394386oig.13 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KuwWOPJWR5NanRn7F090Jj80fq4iZT29TnVURHa7Qtw=; b=gVYuOUrNlS3SHsAGVisj3FDH/M8wMqNxiYiU8lBNvEqNYXamIXDv8eI61MBYHwRWSO s9m/AJ0RbGQms99k8Vh6HMWv4bycK02Zvs1DjkL7eb/rsXAuD8zLnPaqcjsdX+JLyFUI 2GWm7VA8WtYQjIGcgzKcGCVGQDDEWHEmI9RLSTwav9z3F9NkeyB5NhnFF2n1E4NLS7Xy VtbQVtuYNz62gbo4q2JzZmTYvSOx99SZUuYZXdSklKGoJoLQZbOhj5WFWoIccrFEdGPx V1ROm2UB4hVovANzoTvSEpNdLJfGyAtph01tUzGuLprHyDEQw6LnLUvyC00tTgkFP2SL tWNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KuwWOPJWR5NanRn7F090Jj80fq4iZT29TnVURHa7Qtw=; b=QHUvw8aaoqh5M4dvokAO6rm6fT3nF/EEEXAg77XaYO/z0iHLX2qdlr4ikmhRmtF+kF l+rpjW4KBetfdiaAIzGA0CAB8bVJD5Qe3OC7VJz5JOPscqVX9Vx4YXZwYeMwp2gxQPX4 X8fCQcGYFPdI70TOLoXxAadMXrUrdttIgki5yxpyPqusu06CebFsxVavygUmGlH6pR1e 1vnOEriJ5Q7qicJPp8OhD43R1uvp/GkcPzoLiA+BubptiHbXuhz74bgWsyzTgcewsMFu H6V/TWTdSFa7THJ0kWCIODVe63wfh3ATQwUK/IHLLhOPC2wISZWlMI8iMz1SbUP4Ms4a wSfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308kU92BRt6FKXcqZvUHq0K3X84w3hYn5jK8CNXwcaHzK7aKFeQ 51bu/LNRCbarPl+F8c31X+quGI059CG/Wd8RcJM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJctYqHtk/SCjmCmntfAivz4Rme2jHXuR/rVEM+aE8XeGDV+um6R2IZebj3JVGomOWzOz54Ekk+LdYo7WuV1s=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1109:: with SMTP id 9mr16846011oir.131.1607898685665; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK2Cwb4KGs05pRJ6AbmJx3Tc6t7NUTABccC1VALLcuJxonYoqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuRtTzueUSTMFBGNfqaYDpHm=7GAdEKaCBDQSkeHuu-OFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOthoTk4fu4Vut9ad7E79MZMy6vKYXUtuY=1zFi7SAPuWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuQEwKXLdc6i6ez_TXLxfSsRuh=wYpfiTHXd=sMmHdWX1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8feuQEwKXLdc6i6ez_TXLxfSsRuh=wYpfiTHXd=sMmHdWX1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2Cwb7PXZybz59b=yj+knGE=hzEtXm1NfO+PREMpU+WEHRk6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>, GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fe742205b660151c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/ZBExrSD_CGB0xuOv7c0tVG8MXtE>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] physical person
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 22:31:28 -0000

agree w/ Fabien on that point.  My own preference would be to call the RO
an entity, which means a named object.
Peace ..tom


On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:23 PM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes.
>
> For end user at least, we wanted to convey that it is a real person.
>
> The case is different for the RO, indeed here person would be enough I
> believe.
>
> Fabien
>
>
> Le dim. 13 déc. 2020 à 21:20, Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> a écrit :
>
>> A natural person is usually implied to be a Human Being.
>> As in jurisprudence, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted only
>> to Natural Persons.
>>
>> A person or entity seems to be more appropriate.
>>
>> --
>> -jim
>> Jim Willeke
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:44 PM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Wasn't thinking about that, but yes.
>>> Natural person would be good. I change it in the wiki.
>>>
>>> Thxs
>>> Fabien
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I dislike this. A robot can be a physical person. What's wrong with
>>>> natural person that others use?
>>>> Peace ..tom
>>>> --
>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>
>>> --
>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>
>> --
>> TXAuth mailing list
>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>
> --
> TXAuth mailing list
> TXAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email