Re: [Txauth] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"

Dick Hardt <> Fri, 15 May 2020 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9543A0973 for <>; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mM2wnPW0J90P for <>; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351943A096B for <>; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id l19so3698688lje.10 for <>; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1TxGrYdhg5HAHM4T2lUwiuIvbGTJcEZSDPxK4cb+dA4=; b=jDnnW4LO+kuRhaQ3h/ZHV8GpeX/gPMWsHRRy+o2I2sREGMnnhpRVwbFOohQ51qMMzl o6XKWI7coY0YJJdXkCbfrHoibWNnVl4sQV5fLY1bLFoAR65psx0q2dyLv2fBVd9nShnD 4NAYyR7fIyxVua7moFDE8aCfxHOq/ogsrYabswUEpol8owDvH9J8gvDvmAv3tiUG1p+P hUAorO8foWvqQVGtYtaPr6+b1EmpOZSvpvnfuhF1Z/2+bB1fpLKzf6nsuA7/OE+85jVS Z8Dho3fhqilCePKPIMDxUvfZGVUBIjOxdwTlFhwLc0G40kwuGNL/wEarhCN7sE7pSILa 2Cdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1TxGrYdhg5HAHM4T2lUwiuIvbGTJcEZSDPxK4cb+dA4=; b=YhYuAI0C/apIwGZEVNfboulfwdaUsMdkliOO3Fn4S/p1zXy9qRqHuw8zl7+9eM5255 jEMVXwlf4RJTG6DiIwa40IiEmn48mQ3UvjMr75McZs0ypkcZFNH1myEHbmahTYF/okwv /mQlVFg52TWzFHUBQwVZOb7G8qe54ZJzEAX9YW7byM++u1PcHgG/iKdrhKVC4n9mTV/E JjKjHsY8lc0nFmns4RA3Fi/Aebq4HWZM/OD1qgwZve8fp/9/WDtFAenowknwVZ/UwFo8 YX45KWvUM//PDq88vTif51ReMbv0p8cVkEmpOL0fCHm6BeaCwtQx96L2HK51aupBp7V7 BLBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kedoOgOPg5briXEpcVzLZj50dHQBbo9TY+dVnuj6Xrt1EzQEh eXRE6y+XMY6uVza1JNv9oCxEJEs/DGipaFAdOuNm+eCC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw45pLYr03wfekC61xIaAIjKtcKXgdO6J/Vts9yd+++uLi5RwoEQtIsfs5haM8rBDeCM57VZBo2JwRughSLpNI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b0f:: with SMTP id u15mr3370923lji.272.1589576678262; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Dick Hardt <>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:04:11 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Justin Richer <>
Cc:, Roman Danyliw <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000404e0d05a5b6290f"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 21:04:44 -0000

Justin: if you have a concern with how I am chairing the group, the
appropriate action would be to bring it up with the AD (cc'ed). FYI: I had
forwarded the log and my conclusions to Roman, and he had agreed that the
poll had been gamed.

As to my proposal of "Authorization and Delegation", I took the name you
had proposed, and removed the adjective that people had found concerning. I
was hoping that a bland name would be acceptable and we could move on to
the actual work -- but that does not seem to be the case.

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:16 PM Justin Richer <> wrote:

> -1
> I think the results of the poll were pretty conclusive and it’s not an act
> of good faith for the chair to propose a poll and then throw out the
> results of that same poll and go with something of their own choosing
> instead.
> How are you sure that it’s one person stuffing the ballot box? For my
> part, I put two dots on the winning title and one dot each of three others.
> I had a couple different people contact me off-list and told me they’d put
> their five dots on Transmission of Authority. So I think it’s reasonable to
> believe that’s the actual result, without examining the logs myself.
>  — Justin
> > On May 15, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Dick Hardt <> wrote:
> >
> > Following on from my email wrt. the results of voting, please indicate
> if you are aligned with calling the working group the "Authorization and
> Delegation" working group with a +1 or -1.
> > --
> > Txauth mailing list
> >
> >