Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!

Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron@parecki.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902213A0E07 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parecki-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ps1KDwZkAwXN for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B473A088E for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id r66so9428254oie.5 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parecki-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eDyB4zhiEdcy0oFYiVStFLep0LzL6dQLkRNrW2RrcG8=; b=WKNKmb86Zcy1N15j71Fq8KkLwgRZ13kxB9ar3gDsYUHzjtZBEPFhDx0mq4BOz754jm Nacvvy7GLoRn4PL6qW/rwH19MsuUMCWgYpy0s3myXHb6xAZYy8o/2UE10VJHSwiEQbY+ Og/eMmkBLpJYvOxj6ArvZGwHE+heaRvghrO+jbUSdImbB938Rbaq69+zqEq5XvUsEDQx TN1wDPI630q8aNg+dsEisgDVD9VdtyDrsa79yFz2VNrM6In/7mF/PzkpoHWEjrCVBqPG N24Dr2oGFXYLWhICGlswlKE9oAPAmHqco03HLvUGO9qZIwSvlch5xcRvCuUSiVvQskgV 7w9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eDyB4zhiEdcy0oFYiVStFLep0LzL6dQLkRNrW2RrcG8=; b=KZVl2br6Y/CtWsR7ncq2QGlEZQ0J/xBKeOoxJrpVooigaGUi5ohZl8LOzJWZbu5M2c paFdrFUMUHKQxj5MMv4yku16ctJmL4aDCpF71ZppT2kEUNMuKflqO+No571TLzbfqgVx jAJ2EVoh02srfnbVklc/YPztvV0Tpumw/PhDEIC95RiS+rvHh/7QgNOoydw4bO22rngd a5o5CeAawifeGKvxE7gJhmJpAQfC6czAUcWO7vKvZmJT9+VXaBrTgrQwk+/m+kU3JUZv JQmAU52otwqdby7a0pakL7UUVkG2p97+N/w3GGugPVhFS0mS7DmHGC36y9brTmLzCutk kkmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuafR71t+t5avQBcrQanV4i1BpCM3lUYNIhmoV1WoEEK1gifl0np vKp/NZvRUXWESMjWI4Okn7gEPVAu1qM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ9D9ACsLAOiMCkjha866f2UdyHK1zEwTGvNBVJlJp4ltQ7TWsir38atMmK5i8Y7QNC3dYeSg==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c4d3:: with SMTP id u202mr11745297oif.113.1588966583242; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com (mail-ot1-f41.google.com. [209.85.210.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y185sm702061ooa.4.2020.05.08.12.36.22 for <txauth@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id m18so2389940otq.9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3e8a:: with SMTP id b10mr3441017otc.15.1588966581962; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-skQf0UtZJ65+oEXKxhPb7Xarhp=h22jocypo52mef7_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-v39n8DjHUNJAf6TC7-KBd6mOEdcLg=FBckmM7=z9SgJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBSGjondG_GvqSxO26RFQt5v0szfDvpcN52MDEnccvUt_tr4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-ubsF42SZFHQMnf9fj6o=-v=6RnoYUJdM01dHzeXRDgvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-ubsF42SZFHQMnf9fj6o=-v=6RnoYUJdM01dHzeXRDgvQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 12:36:10 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAGBSGjo2nyyuwH=5m=7m+gmGqO2+rKx2S_GL8bN-yQg0sDtXTw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGBSGjo2nyyuwH=5m=7m+gmGqO2+rKx2S_GL8bN-yQg0sDtXTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad8e1005a5281c75"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/swfi3vQWqRXGS19HxDJMW9-EABA>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 19:36:32 -0000

I do think there are some valid reasons for calling the spec OAuth 3, but I
will save that for the later discussion of naming the spec if this is just
about the WG name for now.


On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:34 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:18 PM Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote:
>
>> What's not clear to me is whether this is the intended name of the new WG
>> or the spec itself.
>>
>
> likely both, but WG name is what we are deciding now for WG creation
>
>
>>
>> If we're talking about the spec itself, I'd like to throw "OAuth 3" into
>> the mix. Obviously that's not a good name for the WG though.
>>
>
> We had earlier discussions that I think concluded that OAuth 3 was not an
> appropriate. Name.
>
>
>>
>> Is there a requirement that the spec produced by this group have the same
>> name as the group itself?
>>
>
> Not a hard requirement, but is usual. The mail list will continue to be
> txauth@ietf.org. Calling the core protocol something different would
> create confusion I think.
>
>
>
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:13 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Reminder to participate in name suggestions! The cutoff for suggestions
>>> is Friday.
>>>
>>> Nigel has created a list here:
>>>
>>> https://nigelhamilton.com/pages/txauth-name-game.html
>>>
>>> ᐧ
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:08 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We now have our criteria for names, and we can now start the next step
>>>> in our process, brainstorming names!
>>>>
>>>> Here is the criteria again:
>>>>
>>>> Required:
>>>>
>>>>    1. No confusion with another protocol, major software project, or
>>>>    IETF/IRTF WG name
>>>>    2. no existing registered trademarks in related classes
>>>>    3. Less than 1M results in Google
>>>>    4. Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
>>>>    5. Not an offensive meaning to a member of the mail list
>>>>
>>>> Desirable:
>>>>
>>>>    1. Straightforward to pronounce
>>>>    2. Easy to spell
>>>>    3. Easy to read
>>>>    4. Shortish
>>>>
>>>> We won't be judging or ranking names at this time -- we are
>>>> brainstorming names that are descriptive of the protocol.
>>>> We are hoping we can get the WG approved in the telechat May 21,
>>>> so ideally we would have r*ough consensus on the name by May 18.*
>>>>
>>>> Let's brainstorm for a week, and then we can stack rank them on our
>>>> objective criteria, and then vote on the top candidates.
>>>>
>>>> I'll start by submitting my favorite:
>>>>
>>>> XAuth - Extensible delegated Authorization and Authentication protocol,
>>>> or just view the X as a placeholder and XAuth is OAuth ++
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Txauth mailing list
>>> Txauth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>
>>