IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] physical person

Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5551B3A129C for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nduu3x7dhCK5 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D8543A1295 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id y5so17647313iow.5 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:30:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jIKd3B7hNDEM5jE8NyEUt/BvKHkfzW63yHTIfwz5drM=; b=I6326F+rvvlQEwd/0lVoy1/Cpu3BJkO0+dNfBY3DcnhrbQ6qMHZwCff675gU8HRWkY HjE0p5dmfSdIb8Wdx0WI+vPTib/2OLkkCG5uaEJ0Whc3aLD1eDgkfZMKW5f8qxs3qNrL dzgV2+MhEz/wTq/9Z2MPwr9xWMCB+y0WAJu1h2rKKpcxmQXNawWlBjnbRn9LRrS1Msp3 IDIEcfnInu0W5OKlinfIcUYrKRmGGOc2xOp6ZMKe0fs3VZqa2wrB8EWrMBjxsj1o7HO4 D+FoaA8s07tr/EtqkKOrsf9R14RNS46TKebo1MBBBIpebm9wTDn1G89HoLGbjgb0BrpN ooDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jIKd3B7hNDEM5jE8NyEUt/BvKHkfzW63yHTIfwz5drM=; b=EKvbveLpJSqfROy7Cal4qofScska3Exr+IdJwMt1eofIZbyqgM577BN+PXfoHg1M8s FOnrEgOn1y2BUZ0HeLp6hz23wtXoEFbT6dwYexjPz3fNlw0H2cwlMDaNyrkLoVWqMwbq mp4gHbpRK/23R1nDKA0BecJlmLAZi+OLwr2qS8W6g4UBrKTZddOCzFPU4wQ/Vo94Q4VT fbp0/eDcWR+galpeniU4Da5VoT9Tf8N2mkAuHSx5kqUjU9fs7lIAHNz0meMPOZsSg7cl h1qAU16SKr1KgS0Ko0kJgmI6BjiGJBuh8+GBE94V6hjuMECLh2g8kwS5Is+15Uy7aZVO uBGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531K1QStB5B/LpTFjgEiJmhLx+R6f6cWdDMrey20oZWiP1bVd175 TyQNL8adjdvoTZqnqTLcXIgM4mSWUjDvYyrKxes=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGTq2aGSXTYD3EcCF9KlMyU1uhXuDphJ06uhUn8iN7dayZNyCamntQkRbYAraSzVexxDedn7Z122eb0Sa/P2Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9f8b:: with SMTP id a11mr34891930jam.108.1607967017732; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:30:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK2Cwb4KGs05pRJ6AbmJx3Tc6t7NUTABccC1VALLcuJxonYoqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuRtTzueUSTMFBGNfqaYDpHm=7GAdEKaCBDQSkeHuu-OFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOthoTk4fu4Vut9ad7E79MZMy6vKYXUtuY=1zFi7SAPuWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuQEwKXLdc6i6ez_TXLxfSsRuh=wYpfiTHXd=sMmHdWX1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAK2Cwb7PXZybz59b=yj+knGE=hzEtXm1NfO+PREMpU+WEHRk6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOv1GQ_SJyHE4RboPCoLiivgvY+5TDjJ7CqzCj5gyGT+Jg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuSADSs2OwZprdyJnd5bK_td7Yo9mQOAg-ja8zRpGux8FQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK2Cwb6M8fRK0Sma-R+jp9ovRiEyZdwC3J5Rhj0S1tVUtRo5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK2Cwb6M8fRK0Sma-R+jp9ovRiEyZdwC3J5Rhj0S1tVUtRo5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:30:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8feuSgPRjNT8oABcTGxe4vjnNLDBWL_HD+9crzzSnK+Y+9Rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>, GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e70f6d05b66ffe45"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/ve--8qIr6HwblZfa2GB2GJUm2go>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] physical person
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:30:21 -0000

Ok I've updated the wiki with alternative 1.
Cheers
Fabien

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:53 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Either sounds good to me.
>
> thx ..Tom (mobile)
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 12:57 AM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your inputs, we can try to update the definition of RO
>> using "entity".
>>
>> Currently we have : person acting on its own or representing an
>> organization, that may grant privileges on resources he has authority upon
>>
>> Alternative 1 : personal or organizational entity that may grant
>> privileges on resources it has authority upon
>> Alternative 2 : entity that may grant privileges on resources it has
>> authority upon
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Fabien
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I agree.
>>> --
>>> -jim
>>> Jim Willeke
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:31 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> agree w/ Fabien on that point.  My own preference would be to call the
>>>> RO an entity, which means a named object.
>>>> Peace ..tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:23 PM Fabien Imbault <
>>>> fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> For end user at least, we wanted to convey that it is a real person.
>>>>>
>>>>> The case is different for the RO, indeed here person would be enough I
>>>>> believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fabien
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le dim. 13 déc. 2020 à 21:20, Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> A natural person is usually implied to be a Human Being.
>>>>>> As in jurisprudence, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted
>>>>>> only to Natural Persons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A person or entity seems to be more appropriate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -jim
>>>>>> Jim Willeke
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:44 PM Fabien Imbault <
>>>>>> fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wasn't thinking about that, but yes.
>>>>>>> Natural person would be good. I change it in the wiki.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thxs
>>>>>>> Fabien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Tom Jones <
>>>>>>> thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I dislike this. A robot can be a physical person. What's wrong with
>>>>>>>> natural person that others use?
>>>>>>>> Peace ..tom
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>
>>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email