IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] physical person

Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0523A0DBA for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LNkdsc1e0wZ for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8ECA3A0DA0 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id i18so16158813ioa.1 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nqk9HPgUay8JWRjC0l3ucSPYCEpBxh3dWhs7BF6jxY4=; b=Cya8vHaVaesu8va9Q9RVddB9kFjnzVIFeRABGE+Rs8I+gFHS1eS423cmgrdcIUffn4 nV9KFuB0FxrAlj5ETmBee6tPjlH6CJ5kKSU7IbMrqhW9MftmQm+m/vrzrB2hAux0mGOO 7lX6zL15fCYWnxMMch9T5N7YDpY7+rV2j00PTWXUYog9mNPXv1qLqN/pr2KxmFTam5A8 NPY7pO55mLoOdBuUBE2iJQbb683mUx0GEpni2hbHm45AGvOGD53uol673Hb6S+VZl4oT XqKLQfGaE2BC2dSGx+Ap9tV50oxRwgdX1uyZq5hs6ZwF3qYvM9E+0UyhIj0F27gZB8/0 nASw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nqk9HPgUay8JWRjC0l3ucSPYCEpBxh3dWhs7BF6jxY4=; b=X9LUnsFkIg+4PxF+UBr4UVUWuVH/OQy/X141bDJDSalFN3RZ/020Jx2xJh/OZ5eFM8 BreVkFJxwlpPrFKJcRrHkWrM9Ul5nwPR0CPa8Qk2TEaVFJNyymN1cHljZoVbTXqJw3VC Y+BzttxRsathdgZAFIjHZeKRZSBX/yfC0WuEgQu4FKeNJDasEowd69mwJOdEBYw5kHS9 Kj2ZcSZe6a8/0I0VmLfmONPM9zHMebUNrNHK7+vXo9MjCvOm25fAkjDxCjbM4sGYP0nU 0wN814EkclCVEiRlZ3ndfghOcOtLpH3J3Zn024Jzqf+8Qb7ivzwbX4tRqrw9ni53oneW DpTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532apOa5mQ/rJcKDNwSOPyWoA6nMHvHsDB1iVbAMh4zaVRamb9LL HhEAA3SWwkg+L6+nEYyx19im8tY1vLmtygA9q+wqGSdHhLJCh9vJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxFSzeQyW0qJDWg2oc/mZxLVqwAPVIqDmFNogqa3ekPf4IzWWF9HIeOw+yt2/i8lb6disGrIHKmzYBnrke9NQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:dd13:: with SMTP id f19mr30892001ioc.74.1607936270081; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK2Cwb4KGs05pRJ6AbmJx3Tc6t7NUTABccC1VALLcuJxonYoqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuRtTzueUSTMFBGNfqaYDpHm=7GAdEKaCBDQSkeHuu-OFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOthoTk4fu4Vut9ad7E79MZMy6vKYXUtuY=1zFi7SAPuWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuQEwKXLdc6i6ez_TXLxfSsRuh=wYpfiTHXd=sMmHdWX1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAK2Cwb7PXZybz59b=yj+knGE=hzEtXm1NfO+PREMpU+WEHRk6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAB3ntOv1GQ_SJyHE4RboPCoLiivgvY+5TDjJ7CqzCj5gyGT+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB3ntOv1GQ_SJyHE4RboPCoLiivgvY+5TDjJ7CqzCj5gyGT+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:57:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8feuSADSs2OwZprdyJnd5bK_td7Yo9mQOAg-ja8zRpGux8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>
Cc: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>, GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033258005b668d6e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/w5Kt96vJJ3UX6wGcUbtqbv0RvuQ>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] physical person
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:57:53 -0000

Thanks for your inputs, we can try to update the definition of RO
using "entity".

Currently we have : person acting on its own or representing an
organization, that may grant privileges on resources he has authority upon

Alternative 1 : personal or organizational entity that may grant privileges
on resources it has authority upon
Alternative 2 : entity that may grant privileges on resources it has
authority upon

What do you think?

Cheers
Fabien

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> wrote:

> Yes, I agree.
> --
> -jim
> Jim Willeke
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:31 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> agree w/ Fabien on that point.  My own preference would be to call the RO
>> an entity, which means a named object.
>> Peace ..tom
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:23 PM Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> For end user at least, we wanted to convey that it is a real person.
>>>
>>> The case is different for the RO, indeed here person would be enough I
>>> believe.
>>>
>>> Fabien
>>>
>>>
>>> Le dim. 13 déc. 2020 à 21:20, Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> A natural person is usually implied to be a Human Being.
>>>> As in jurisprudence, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted
>>>> only to Natural Persons.
>>>>
>>>> A person or entity seems to be more appropriate.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -jim
>>>> Jim Willeke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:44 PM Fabien Imbault <
>>>> fabien.imbault@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wasn't thinking about that, but yes.
>>>>> Natural person would be good. I change it in the wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thxs
>>>>> Fabien
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Tom Jones <
>>>>> thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I dislike this. A robot can be a physical person. What's wrong with
>>>>>> natural person that others use?
>>>>>> Peace ..tom
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>>
>>> --
>>> TXAuth mailing list
>>> TXAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email