Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!

Steinar Noem <steinar@udelt.no> Wed, 13 May 2020 04:13 UTC

Return-Path: <steinar@udelt.no>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523B23A0D32 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=udelt-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zftwhUtupgHH for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C39B3A046E for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id m18so12360798otq.9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udelt-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1SCbzEu+qFI4qsNm3P0gLWMz/tamiQAG7lmYhm7SGyg=; b=qS8y+6pTSc7IgdUlGq5qYdM/A9P7gaAfo+HPWoW5Rn02x2b5lyotGmjnz2xb8HxIkg W71fx7wN+kjvUXrsOTgN9sBPNjjr7G1F/prW4/hPJGFJ+RhGw06t+Dy/XONU9LEgzsEc 7Nh7LqZh+85Lwt+mG+kEtlCJzC4+V/KK9lPgdiNlY7gKwQfp2So/AltxGo/IfBm2RRMW Hs9wyGXEEGTTrr2yPC0WEyvrfOJfrmDWsEP08ajBfuh6JYUGeCMNJz2EUS5aP0qcqmBn mfg5pcVxiF9xCyGvPwnYy+ykVXTXEjyS/0YhzspPjjr04Ur4o7sqf3PfJ8zPQRpSjUWl Mw3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1SCbzEu+qFI4qsNm3P0gLWMz/tamiQAG7lmYhm7SGyg=; b=k0BhH+AZmhwSXgy+vLHhiEUlR4WN63AAkRpvOsG3gTX7DkAxZkO0jyFQEslyVpDYlt zYhf8zten9iXDb3O1NOW0kgUpNYlrEquAKZO88L2OMYiXuyCuxi4tdat7OTUYRVXs1Ao 90yZqY5SxZWPVlSMBG9lO8va5uRnfn11bY6/iIBWLR0MPIyStDT/TXa2/J3p+MkhxS9N 5zT1lSSlVyL2d02ef9LIIe6+YuW4hluHJAkuotBM7jX3kLXWBcpyqFVV+lwG+DLSo8PI UcSup4fj6NXsKGpevO0oC88HahW8Z5FmnfyVCdGRClomsh9yWEYapphauiCn8Zx/9OZ0 f4mA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZUjJTdc5abzwvoPgje4vfTFpk18WUj72YY9Lv/FcIIx/g2H2w8 gU1T7LZ7wgLi7NvO4s6QwY44L4E9Ak+yf6F7+ALSiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLcVtAWkTbEMq6tXZeIEGzKKPBWaKsVcB+TL2hfv2EfmSm8rdL9Ola8KbrNSNRl6apUoTMtaW7cnOhcvEwFb3M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:20d8:: with SMTP id z24mr19942912otq.74.1589343201563; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-v2TC+GFs-OCL2oMpjWmzHPJMKKmKSMxKNMqz1Y51Q5kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-tb4Oew88YNfqrgWeH0gD-cn9kL7SKHHbqTekQb3dc8ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-sd_7S=W-sBrxVkPjrxviEUWKuFf2UaBPFh8LEQHzqr3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-sd_7S=W-sBrxVkPjrxviEUWKuFf2UaBPFh8LEQHzqr3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steinar Noem <steinar@udelt.no>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:13:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHsNOKerUo-d9G87F5TdKWjdWURDzVmDsDc9LKUZDYt26mpGwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4bfb505a57fcc88"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/wBoWz4jL5AvYuKovfJK1ZT5ECxY>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] WG Name Voting!!!
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 04:13:26 -0000

God morgen!
The acronym CTAP is used by the Fido Alliance innit? (Client to
Authenticator Protocol)
It is an incredibly sexy name for a WG, but it might not be the best
choice..

tir. 12. mai 2020 kl. 22:50 skrev Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>om>:

> In the poll, somehow I entered ZAuthZ instead of XAuthZ -- A dot for
> ZAuthZ is really a dot for XAuthZ
>
> Apologies. Editing the poll creates a new link which seems even more
> confusing.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:44 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, so much for all the effort I did in sorting. The voting service
>> randomizes the entries on each load ....
>>
>> Here is what is in the spreadsheet for your convenience ...
>>
>> abbrev pronunciation syllables WG Name
>> PAuthZ paws 1 Protocol for Authorization
>> AZARP a-zarp 2 AuthoriZed Access to Resources Protocol
>> CTAP cee-tap 2 Comprehensive Token Access Protocol
>> GNAP guh-nap 2 Grant Negotiation and Authorization Protocol
>> GranPro gran-pro 2 GRAnt Negotiation Protocol
>> NIRAD nir-ad 2 Negotiation of Intent Registration and Authority
>> Delegation
>> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Extension Auth
>> TIDEAuth tide-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Extension Auth
>> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Transference via Intent Driven Yield Auth
>> TIDYAuth tidy-auth 2 Trust via Intent Driven Yield Auth
>> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Transference via Intent Extension Auth
>> TIEAuth tie-auth 2 Trust via Intent Extension Auth
>> AAuthZ a-auth-zee 3 Alternative Authorization Protocol (AAuthZ)
>> AZARAP az-a-rap 3 AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
>> CompAuthZ comp-auth-zee 3 Componentized Authorization Protocol
>> DAZARAP daz-a-rap 3 Delegated AuthoriZation And Resource Access Protocol
>> DisAuthZ dis-auth-zee 3 Dismembered Authorization Protocol
>> ReAuthZ re-auth-z 3 Reimagined Authorization Protocol
>> RefAuthZ ref-auth-z 3 Refactored Authorization Protocol
>> TIARP t-i-arp 3 Tokenized Identity and Access Resource Protocol
>> TINOA tin-o-a 3 This Is Not OAuth
>> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Testable eXtensible Authorization
>> TxAuth t-x-auth 3 Transmission of Authority
>> TXAuth t-x-auth 3 Truly eXtensible Authorization
>> ZAuthZ x-auth-z 3 eXtensible authoriZation protocol
>> BeBAuthZ be-be-auth-zee 4 Back-end Based Authorization Protocol
>> CIOAuth cee-eye-o-auth 4 Client Intent Origin Auth
>> BYOAuthZ be-y-o-auth-zee 5 Build-Your-Own Authorization Protocol
>> CPAAP cee-pee-a-a-pee 5 Comprehensive Privileged Authentication
>> Authorization Protocol
>> DIYAuthZ dee-i-y-auth-zee 5 Do-It-Yourself Authorization Protocol
>> IDPAuthZ i-dee-pee-auth-z 5 Intent Driven Protocol for Authorization
>> TIAAP t-i-a-a-p 5 Tokenized Identity and Access Protocol
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:37 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Everyone
>>>
>>> We are now ready to do some dot voting
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-voting>
>>>
>>> We have 32 suggestions in the list Nigel managed
>>> <https://nigelhamilton.com/pages/txauth-name-game.html> that did not
>>> conflict with something else and were googlable.
>>> (if your name did not make the list, neither did my XAuth suggestion!)
>>>
>>> If you feel strongly a name not in the list to be voted on should be
>>> there, email me privately.
>>>
>>> I sorted the list based on shortishness (see below)
>>>
>>> Reminder, the expansion is the name of the working group, that will be
>>> at top of this page https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/txauth/about/
>>>
>>> *Please goto this page to dot vote:*
>>>
>>> https://mindiply.com/products/decido/decisions/znxVEip81xOUjA
>>>
>>> *Please don't vote more than once!*
>>>
>>> If there is overwhelming support for one name, then we are done. If not,
>>> then I'll cull the list and we will vote again.
>>>
>>> /Dick
>>>
>>> *Sorting Order*
>>> I made my best guess on how I would pronounce the acronym/backronym, and
>>> counted the syllables, as shortish was one of the selection criteria.
>>>
>>> The names are sorted by # syllables, alphabetical order of abbreviation,
>>> then alphabetical order of WG name. The spreadsheet I used is here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N2vZY8xNjyAtvcY1PgVjY6ugxeUVSGoR98r2Nqu968c/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>


-- 
Vennlig hilsen

Steinar Noem
Partner Udelt AS
Systemutvikler

| steinar@udelt.no | hei@udelt.no  | +47 955 21 620 | www.udelt.no |