Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-service-08.txt> (Time Zone Data Distribution Service) to Proposed Standard
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 17 June 2015 20:11 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42201B2BF8; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZSNfe-x5sbP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8F91B2DCC; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2942; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1434571874; x=1435781474; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=5WJsq3HDz7cFne2nylq1Po9wlrpO/N7p6P/6OHNGvCY=; b=dEuJ9elVD2fKpysBkiQiS2292ILv6Rlr2QrT0yVllUVbBOhWBlH8iWZx CeBqWhmWQ9XAYqsuIU8i29wiNcBjT6yEyXHMlATWzAElc4gdhOodFJGN9 iAHs4dyUBhdiG3u5nvJDykr1h+hKsfwDoMPUmtHqQzsx3Xf2sjDFNpBjR Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AwBAB504FV/xbLJq1chEODHro/CYdfAoFyFAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEEI0sKARALGAkWBAcCAgkDAgECATQRBgEMAQUCAQGIK7BxgxeTKAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLRIUGB4JogUMBBJNogiKBTYdYgTSECoJojB+DWyaCCxwVgT88MYJIAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,634,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="531456898"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2015 20:11:11 +0000
Received: from [10.61.219.42] ([10.61.219.42]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5HKBAYO019907; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:11:10 GMT
Message-ID: <5581D45E.2020504@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:11:10 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20150603182116.2080.11678.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AA8400C4-08C5-49D1-9C1A-B9B0A0432F2A@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <AA8400C4-08C5-49D1-9C1A-B9B0A0432F2A@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pbJ2thutP2C2vrxj65fNhtdbWrlcfXKWf"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/4H30xgdcB0ZhYK4jy54cDXZdLRY>
Cc: tzdist@ietf.org, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-service-08.txt> (Time Zone Data Distribution Service) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:11:16 -0000
Hi Patrik, Just a question on one of your two points: On 6/17/15 8:17 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > On 3 Jun 2015, at 15:21, The IESG wrote: > >> The IESG has received a request from the Time Zone Data Distribution Service WG (tzdist) to consider the following document: >> - 'Time Zone Data Distribution Service' >> <draft-ietf-tzdist-service-08.txt> as Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-06-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > I have two comments that neither should be blocking for this draft to be published, but I encourage IETF/IAB to take the issues serious because one day we will be bitten by this. I have been following the evolution of this since I was Area Director and while I think the tzdist work is something that should have been done from day one of the iCal work, I do not think we are done yet. > > Good: Personally I have been pushing for not having TZ definitions in the events themselves, but instead have then referenced since the iCal spec was an I-D. In those days, I was in the rough side of rough consensus, so it is good to see things go in the right directions at last :-) > > Steps for improvement: The references to the timezones is by the TZID, and that is good, but I think most parties when deciding on an event pin it to a geographical location, like city/country or so in some combination. Because of this I think ultimately a reference should be in the form of a location that the tzid service should be able to resolve to the correct TZ definition (i.e. time + location gives TZ definition). How do you want user-facing client behavior to change? I'm not sure I see that. Thanks, Eliot
- [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-service-08… The IESG
- Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-servic… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-servic… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-servic… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Tzdist] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tzdist-servic… Cyrus Daboo