IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Mon, 24 August 2015 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DE11ACC8C; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJcEWz05k7d6; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.105.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606AE1B33CE; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-76-180-151-43.buffalo.res.rr.com [76.180.151.43]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t7OMQnCR029383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:26:51 -0400
Message-ID: <55DB9A29.8020408@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:26:49 -0400
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJKAephrJS=XHfMSM3C3qpH4_Monn+Ear1vhCjMtqVZ+4w@mail.gmail.com> <4733A6EDE125B3121612FE24@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4733A6EDE125B3121612FE24@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.8.24.222115
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 28% ( SXL_IP_DYNAMIC 3, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_RESIDENTIAL 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __RDNS_POOLED_1 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 28%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 128.2.105.204
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/Hq-BHSTbhhmg7zZOcOkipR-GUNk>
Cc: tzdist@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:27:02 -0000

On 08/24/2015 05:26 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>
> Since there was push back along the same lines by the Prefer 
> designated expert I would like to propose removing use of the Prefer 
> header and instead replace it with a new HTTP request header:
>
> CalDAV-Timezones: Y
> CalDAV-Timezones: N
>
> With the "Y" value requesting the server to send VTZ data, and "N" 
> requesting that no VTZ data is sent.
>
> If there is agreement that this addresses the problem of using Prefer, 
> then I will go ahead and make this change in the next document update.
>


I'm fine with using a new header as proposed.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email