Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 05:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B881A88D8; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMdz0vGNkcum; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDEB41A1A1D; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1709; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1440480470; x=1441690070; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7NOrbjD0UaE7iYlvr6RFpk9QuJNFoxyOBWDnajSwLMk=; b=Z7HL/E0QAs63Jca51BlzzweqdWUOHoiTMK1dPyauMtoM1jiMuGGf1v75 gUExJQmIstoevV0vyzCvb8EYuCnxqZ35whADDud+o7iE1uXxFtYrBje+t n8P3VQTy8b7x920DXX+odTtEB9z9A7NYMq/OgJCFzBAPtXo/tEn/BlWQw k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DiBACH+9tV/xbLJq1dg2+EDsJXAoF7AQEBAQEBgQuEJAEBBCNIDQEQCxgJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwIAQGIKrIglR8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGYtXhD9LB4JpgUMBBJU0gkCBXIhWgUqHKYkpiDMmhAA8gn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,744,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="604683651"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2015 05:27:48 +0000
Received: from [10.61.162.49] ([10.61.162.49]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7P5RljI021650; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:27:48 GMT
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <CALaySJKAephrJS=XHfMSM3C3qpH4_Monn+Ear1vhCjMtqVZ+4w@mail.gmail.com> <4733A6EDE125B3121612FE24@caldav.corp.apple.com> <CALaySJLy-yoCwGaeOvr1F+2t7ZOApvtNurN3Bfsq6eQGSDVf7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <55DBFCD3.4060703@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:27:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLy-yoCwGaeOvr1F+2t7ZOApvtNurN3Bfsq6eQGSDVf7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="42T1tcd40fqnNgQ7gED1PQQ0I7I3RWuSN"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/LMMP3Yf8D7K3CMipVvmSoIQ4GMA>
Cc: tzdist@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:27:53 -0000


On 8/24/15 11:51 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
>> Since there was push back along the same lines by the Prefer designated
>> expert I would like to propose removing use of the Prefer header and instead
>> replace it with a new HTTP request header:
>>
>> CalDAV-Timezones: Y
>> CalDAV-Timezones: N
>>
>> With the "Y" value requesting the server to send VTZ data, and "N"
>> requesting that no VTZ data is sent.
>>
>> If there is agreement that this addresses the problem of using Prefer, then
>> I will go ahead and make this change in the next document update.
> That also sounds reasonable.  What will the default be if
> CalDAV-Timezones is absent?
>

For backward compatibility I would suggest that it be that VTIMEZONEs
are transmitted.

Eliot