Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 3 - 4

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 08 May 2015 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE881B2F99; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8m9FS0-7xlaH; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B364F1B2F96; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so38978024wiu.1; Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iBc2pAZDvgteu9las58ZWrU6vwhCd5JsUuL1mR7q7Vw=; b=p7PiQz4k6wWOuZiyzM9BtRmkB0skjZ8Pt2faMlUuC1PgIB1v2oja5DdUazQIjy3yNG IKldFTMoYOuQGUImig5+aCSZFiF0aKLRNTHWkBBWjhUE7KIDP0UvtqMOhzRi4nTDtwqs bXmsMkyjmY6LmNkszh9X0uNBp4t1WT0wVpoFQHC79aFtawjo4ufaII/7Q7WtSBI2r+hT u6EdItfbc07eGaYvW+UEMWi9lIkJdqrRUzehT9Kpp/JT18sV0NJulrATFHNgOW9YwG7G CpGtSY9G0yfBfRSbmrzJ28JbWQQY1aKqefiw9c4V8CJ6Whx6j54lN1McJx/rVzPZ7Hyn xXFg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.7.97 with SMTP id i1mr10556518wja.107.1431115558545; Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.237.234 with HTTP; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTknbCsG9adzzi_anoYEsMc3jemp-fRRyurdbg0K16qeXyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJKUcgkMNsFPk0X6ur-Fw0LrB0-miQvAKYJD2rMCEFpBSQ@mail.gmail.com> <261532677658A4DDDF1A0BAA@cyrus.local> <554CFD71.3010909@andrew.cmu.edu> <CALaySJ+EcBLx2t8NFi8RBTUPqEJy1rRgX5ZqW7ThDQNaqRxnNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTknbCsG9adzzi_anoYEsMc3jemp-fRRyurdbg0K16qeXyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 21:05:58 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8vUQ3uGh3s63dWxoqSoE16tOrv8
Message-ID: <CALaySJKdT4YGJATXih4eEwq9ofvFcu2nxebfJVJYgD+qN9b_2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/VbGEc3UTJ1uv4jUi-b4rX0Et_Ps>
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, "tzdist@ietf.org" <tzdist@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tzdist-service@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tzdist-service@ietf.org>, Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 3 - 4
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 20:06:00 -0000

> I would also favor that push will be treated as an extension as it may
> introduce significant complexity especially if secondary servers and
> primaries belong to different domains.

Right: a push mechanism could definitely be complex, and with lots of
security considerations.  I think that, given the discussion of how
polls will mostly not have to return much data, the polling is likely
not to be too bad.

Barry