Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 8 - 10

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 12 May 2015 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4801ACD6C; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9DNEhXqX7Oiz; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849DE1ACD58; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so24582959wid.0; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ngHWe6blp6KIlL9dn46tddEEsY/eL1Ok1xZgjCQBAP4=; b=zGiAEj4w6HIKMVcFv9MWUewZ106tJdBdw5qtkix+2tT6CMgfLP3D9j9FtXrzr+qWpz 0e7pYmZ24ZcimVwvFckwpKsLGXW5v/N+EZYp8p0/8o/0pFTG5z0LHfv61ofUgUmaxo2g TPpBxSmolpcI0DOrjlVio+NBHq2BkiM2pxibWYaI6rABJCEuw6UZ9mA+3qUr8FAbOnkn czc8jXCY2WjY+22Fm1fC44udDsV76MsIUL+cee+uL+z9/c2ht6mpv7VCPu/J5fk9hVvV p9yJhbdop66Tb5DGkXjAo7gcSuA4tlTQ199c0lqa39axvjS2sswO79kb1n46t+1Eo6FL 3Hqg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.107.70 with SMTP id ha6mr6941602wib.20.1431450927342; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.237.234 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <88871A9AF67EF351387A3BBF@cyrus.local>
References: <CALaySJKUcgkMNsFPk0X6ur-Fw0LrB0-miQvAKYJD2rMCEFpBSQ@mail.gmail.com> <88871A9AF67EF351387A3BBF@cyrus.local>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 18:15:27 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CIyZ4u_PKtzpN7GmTw6rkAVhDiQ
Message-ID: <CALaySJLtkDjzeiqDvrAj2e0ubTkcboyqdxffRKEEHqBDKnX77A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/X0kJCZKy9ZrdQQSmheKL66PDVVU>
Cc: tzdist@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tzdist-service@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 8 - 10
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:15:29 -0000

Another batch we're almost set on.  I just want to ask one further
question about the insanely over-paranoid privacy stuff (yes, you can
infer my view on this, you can...).

> There was a thorough security/privacy review by Daniel Kahn Gillmor that
> lead to the current text in Section 9 (see tzdist mailing messages with
> "[saag]" in the subject).
...
> Anyway, I am not sure, beyond some small clarifications, if anything needs
> to change in this section. Certainly it needs input from SAAG/Security ADs
> if we do decide to make changes now. Perhaps this should be left to an IETF
> wide review (with another call to SAAG folks to pay attention to it)?

I don't have time right now to read the email thread (about to leave
for vacation until Sunday, back to work on Monday), but I'd like to
know one thing here: Does the tzdist working group have real consensus
on all this?  Or did it merely agree to what's there in order to get
acceptance from the saag folks?

Barry