Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale?
Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> Tue, 06 January 2015 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <lester@lsces.co.uk>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED711A87CA
for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 07:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ch2f0j40Uo0m for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 07:41:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail4.serversure.net (mail4-2.serversure.net [217.147.176.214])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBD51A6F32
for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 07:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 19115 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2015 15:41:52 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19109, pid: 19112, t: 0.0485s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?)
(lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.169.173.116)
by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 6 Jan 2015 15:41:52 -0000
Message-ID: <54AC0240.2020402@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:41:52 +0000
From: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tzdist@ietf.org
References: <21675.2462.186194.702206@compute03.cs.columbia.edu>
<258A901779432BE2E9A929AD@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <258A901779432BE2E9A929AD@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/XtaJMKFVM66F1ShrVrU1VX6VyiY
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale?
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>,
<mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>,
<mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:41:58 -0000
On 06/01/15 15:24, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > At this point, I think the use of non-Gregorian rules in VTIMEZONE > should not be ruled out, but tzdist does not need to support it until we > have publishers actually wanting to use it. Of course at that point > things will get tricky for the publisher as they will want to keep the > Gregorian rules around for backwards compatibility. version takes care of that on one level, but just as the binary TZ data uses different TZid's for with or without leapseconds, calendar would potentially become part of the id? Essentially which ever method of describing a data set is used it has to match every other method? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
- [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Doug Royer
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Lester Caine
- [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale?
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Lester Caine
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [Tzdist] How should tzdist support rscale? Jonathan Lennox