IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 3 - 4

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Fri, 08 May 2015 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9111A90DD; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sRdOdpvB7vy; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11651A8908; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4654113586DC; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:24:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5RfZfNVtzPgC; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:24:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E023E13586D0; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:24:50 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <CFD06D9B3517163605DA0E5B@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKKWF5BAKeNCu9VsLb7QrsEMwA2Jy6rn0Lz_3kz2v7vdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJKUcgkMNsFPk0X6ur-Fw0LrB0-miQvAKYJD2rMCEFpBSQ@mail.gmail.com> <261532677658A4DDDF1A0BAA@cyrus.local> <CALaySJKKWF5BAKeNCu9VsLb7QrsEMwA2Jy6rn0Lz_3kz2v7vdA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0b1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="636"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/_8j9Uv45gIX0V9P_g5lU-DHM_F0>
Cc: tzdist@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tzdist-service@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-service-07 - Sections 3 - 4
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 20:24:57 -0000

Hi Barry,

--On May 8, 2015 at 9:04:34 PM +0100 Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> 
wrote:

>> TXT RR was added in RFC6764 after quite some debate with various IETF DNS
>> experts who were quite insistent that it was not appropriate to rely on
>> .well-known alone.
>
> Really?  I should check the list archive on that, because I don't see
> why.  It's an HTTP-based protocol, so it's perfectly sensible for its
> anchor to come from .well-known.  Hm.

Look for the thread "TSV-DIR review of draft-daboo-srv-caldav-05". I 
believe both ietf@ietf.org and tsv-dir@ietf.org were CC'd on that. Dates 
back to July 2010.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email