IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tzdist] WGLC for draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 28 January 2015 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D401A1A92 for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:56:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0TUmTQXn5cUx for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:56:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4DD1A1A50 for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:56:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9289; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422478562; x=1423688162; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=EZzRlIFfGOut41xrl3SVfWewUoZO18WPOcrmGKcbnr0=; b=XXbem3YbLZVJObi2HimJ87ZzzrPNtG1eR+dtcl1M/9UvmfoPJVu7oGdi 2KSmOBGoQBOZ2Mq23WlrXSCiKSGhQAgkZue3w9azCY3F5jpMWCiIxmgBP C5CbOZvegX/Fucj5Pf5jHuA2J/CZu3L2bHSI6DxAbP9acuwXAllsVEe/V E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AtBQBgTMlU/xbLJq1SCINYWYMBuCCGTIJiAQmFJ0oCgWABAQEBAX2EDQEBBAEBASBLCgEQCw4KCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBFR8RBgEMAQUCAQGIKA3AP5V+AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF48iDSMmBwmCX4FBBYVGh02DNIEpT4VXgRc2gkuCIIwOIoNvPTGBA4E/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,482,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="326091772"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2015 20:56:00 +0000
Received: from [10.61.105.176] (dhcp-10-61-105-176.cisco.com [10.61.105.176]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0SKu0ql007622; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:56:00 GMT
Message-ID: <54C94CE4.4030805@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:56:04 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
References: <CADZyTkkLu6qQ9LCqDkTHA9o+-YVvQuaUp33kqkAt=PRaQS-Jew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkLu6qQ9LCqDkTHA9o+-YVvQuaUp33kqkAt=PRaQS-Jew@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TchDBKF3N43iHkTetnJ7NctQOaFJupsK9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/dwPQmdhSjEMS08RJzP4mriOUR0s>
Cc: Time Zone Data Distribution Service <tzdist@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] WGLC for draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:56:07 -0000

<Chair hat off>

We had discussed supporting raw TZ database zone files as a new media
type.  As a last call comment, I'd like to know if there is support for
that and whether anyone would be willing to implement?

Eliot



On 1/18/15 10:49 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Dear Friends an Colleagues,
>
> This is the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05 [1]
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05>. Please
> provide all comments by February 2.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Daniel and Eliot
>
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk
> <mailto:lester@lsces.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Looking good!
>
>     Question ... Any reason why 'opaque token' would not be simply the
>     version? Since the data is locked to it's version number nothing else
>     should exist.
>
>     Only problem ...
>     I'm still unconvinced by the attempt to create "monolithic" and
>     "incremental" models! If I am publishing an historic snapshot, I
>     need a
>     complete set of timezones for that version ... even if my publication
>     method is only supplying the incremental changes. It is an
>     implementation detail of the storage process and asking for an
>     'incremental' version just seems wrong. One needs the 'monolithic'
>     version at that point. If my data source is TZ, then the only version
>     numbers are those provided by the 'monolithic' view, but I only notify
>     the incremental changes.
>
>     --
>     Lester Caine - G8HFL
>     -----------------------------
>     Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
>     L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
>     EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
>     Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
>     Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tzdist mailing list
>     Tzdist@ietf.org <mailto:Tzdist@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel Migault
> Orange Labs -- Security
> +33 6 70 72 69 58
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tzdist mailing list
> Tzdist@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email