[Tzdist] WGLC for draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05

Dear Friends an Colleagues,

This is the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05
[1] <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05>. Please
provide all comments by February 2.

Best Regards,

Daniel and Eliot

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tzdist-service-05

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> Looking good!
>
> Question ... Any reason why 'opaque token' would not be simply the
> version? Since the data is locked to it's version number nothing else
> should exist.
>
> Only problem ...
> I'm still unconvinced by the attempt to create "monolithic" and
> "incremental" models! If I am publishing an historic snapshot, I need a
> complete set of timezones for that version ... even if my publication
> method is only supplying the incremental changes. It is an
> implementation detail of the storage process and asking for an
> 'incremental' version just seems wrong. One needs the 'monolithic'
> version at that point. If my data source is TZ, then the only version
> numbers are those provided by the 'monolithic' view, but I only notify
> the incremental changes.
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL
> -----------------------------
> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tzdist mailing list
> Tzdist@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58