Re: Compliance definitions, where will they be?
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Wed, 04 November 1992 05:51 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id ab14444;
4 Nov 92 0:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14440;
4 Nov 92 0:51 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27852;
4 Nov 92 0:51 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA01952> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:51:33 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by thumper.bellcore.com
(4.1/4.7)
id <AA01928> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2;
Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:51:28 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690)
id AA17270; Tue, 3 Nov 92 21:50:07 -0800
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Reply-To: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Compliance definitions, where will they be?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue,
03 Nov 1992 22:18:52 EST." <0D15DDF1.hpaqb9@bir.bir.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 21:50:05 -0800
Message-Id: <17266.720856205@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> Is it intended that compliance definitions be in the RFC defining the > mib module, or will a seperate RFC (continually updated) be created > that contains all the compliance definitions for the Internet? > > I realize either could happen. What did you guys plan on? It depends on the circumstances. I would expect that future HR and RR documents would define several such definitions. /mtr
- Re: Compliance definitions, where will they be? Marshall Rose
- Re: Compliance definitions, where will they be? Frank Kastenholz