Re: Status of this working group? (was Re: Squashing important ideas
James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com> Wed, 03 February 1993 15:03 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04601; 3 Feb 93 10:03 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04597; 3 Feb 93 10:03 EST
Received: from SLEEPY.TIS.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09795; 3 Feb 93 10:03 EST
Received: from sleepy.tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa02372; 3 Feb 93 14:49 GMT
Received: from tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa02366; 3 Feb 93 9:42 EST
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA17321; Wed, 3 Feb 93 09:42:29 EST
Message-Id: <9302031442.AA17321@TIS.COM>
Reply-To: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Cc: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com, Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>
Subject: Re: Status of this working group? (was Re: Squashing important ideas
In-Reply-To: "Michael L. Kornegay"'s message of Tue, 02 Feb 93 14:34:06 EST. <0D15DDF1.p8dmum@bir.bir.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1993 09:42:20 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR Content-Domain: RFC822 Originator-ID-Asymmetric: MEYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMSQwIgYDVQQKExtUcnV zdGVkIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uIFN5c3RlbXMxETAPBgNVBAsTCEdsZW53b29k,02 MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,ew8DzUZ0XJ23ML3BX1ldHq50sJ4LI01uICyTxoGXhT0 ODkCFLpx3B4k0twOdsHKoI+oVUy744usHvETmt4AYxg== I call for the chair to repost the revised SNMP Security working group charter. Keith has done this. I also call for the chair to explicitly detail the current state of this working group's progress and proposed schedule for completion. Currently we have before the working group a set of documents representing revisions to RFCs 1351, 1352, and 1353 that incorporate a. the set of changes as suggested by SNMPv2 b. the party proliferation act c. the DES declination act In addition, we have two other documents that have been submitted to the working group for review and consideration. a. The Baby and The Bathwater b. An Improved Model for Implicit Qualification of SNMP MIB Variables The working group discussion was scheduled to close last friday. I have not issued a last call because I'm waiting for our area director to come up to speed so he can participate in the last call. Jim - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message digitally signed with Privacy Enhanced Mail. Get your copy of the Internet reference implementation from "pem-info@tis.com". -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
- Re: Status of this working group? (was Re: Squash… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: Status of this working group? (was Re: Squash… James M Galvin