Re: Proxy mappings

"James R. (Chuck) Davin" <jrd@thyme.lcs.mit.edu> Mon, 20 April 1992 05:34 UTC

Message-Id: <9203262014.AA11893@mace.LCS.MIT.EDU>
From: "James R. (Chuck) Davin" <jrd@thyme.lcs.mit.edu>
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Cc: snmp@nisc.psi.net, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Subject: Re: Proxy mappings
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 25 Mar 92 17:38:01 -0500. <0D15DDF1.vcqnn6@bir.bir.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 92 15:14:30 -0500
Sender: jrd@mace.lcs.mit.edu

The mpsnmp working group effort was based on two existing RFCs
(SNMP/IPX, SNMP/OSI) and an existing internet draft (SNMP/AppleTalk).
Don't remember the numbers offhand, but the titles are suggestive.

>> From: mlk%bir.com@mathcs.emory.edu (Michael L. Kornegay)
>> To: snmp@nisc.psi.net
>> Subject: Re: Proxy mappings
>> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 92 17:38:01 EST
>> Cc: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
>> Reply-To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
>> X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v4
>> 
>> 
>> In Regards to your letter <9203240633.AA20343@nms.netman>an>:
>> > Part of the document I sent out 10 days ago has been overtaken
>> > by the activities of the Multi-Protocols over SNMP working-group
>> > at last week's IETF meeting.  So, the new version below is just
>> > that part which is not being addressed elsewhere.
>> > 
>> > Keith.
>> > -------------
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >           Draft       Proxy between SNMP Transport Mappings       Mar 92
>> > 
>> > 
>> >                       Proxy between SNMP Transport Mappings
>> > 
>> >                              Wed Mar 18 15:40:24 1992
>> 
>> Does the *Multi-Protocols over SNMP working-group* currently have any 
>> information or draft that we can look at?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> ----
>> mlk@bir.com, mlk@bir.uucp, or bir!mlk (Michael L. Kornegay)

Re: Proxy mappings Marshall Rose
Re: Proxy mappings Keith McCloghrie
Re: Proxy mappings tob
Re: Proxy mappings James R. (Chuck) Davin