Re: Textual conventions for humans?
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Wed, 04 November 1992 05:55 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14498;
4 Nov 92 0:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14494;
4 Nov 92 0:55 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27933;
4 Nov 92 0:55 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA02765> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:55:47 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by thumper.bellcore.com
(4.1/4.7)
id <AA02735> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2;
Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:55:42 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690)
id AA17371; Tue, 3 Nov 92 21:54:24 -0800
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Reply-To: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Textual conventions for humans?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue,
03 Nov 1992 22:31:16 EST." <0D15DDF1.hpbhjx@bir.bir.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 21:54:23 -0800
Message-Id: <17367.720856463@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> Paragraph 4 of section 2 of Text Conv for SMP should say "... convenience > of humans and SMP applications ...". rather gratuitous, eh? /mtr
- Re: Textual conventions for humans? Marshall Rose