Re: Inconsistent well known ports?
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Wed, 04 November 1992 05:57 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14526;
4 Nov 92 0:57 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14522;
4 Nov 92 0:57 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27988;
4 Nov 92 0:58 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA03221> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:58:12 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by thumper.bellcore.com
(4.1/4.7)
id <AA03188> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2;
Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:58:08 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690)
id AA17444; Tue, 3 Nov 92 21:56:50 -0800
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Reply-To: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Inconsistent well known ports?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue,
03 Nov 1992 22:52:10 EST." <0D15DDF1.hpcopp@bir.bir.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 21:56:49 -0800
Message-Id: <17440.720856609@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> In Trans Map for SMP, UDP and IPX use the same well known ports they > currently do, while DDP and OSI use new well known ports defined for > SMP. Is this what was intended? When SMP is changed to SNMPv2, the selectors will get changed back to "snmp" and the inconsistency will go away. /mtr
- Re: Inconsistent well known ports? Marshall Rose