Re: Classical Draft Status (long)

Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Tue, 19 October 1993 12:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01683; 19 Oct 93 8:00 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01679; 19 Oct 93 8:00 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id ak01853; 19 Oct 93 8:00 EDT
Received: from matmos.hpl.hp.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00757; 19 Oct 93 6:29 EDT
Received: by matmos.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.4/HPL42.42) id AA05029; Tue, 19 Oct 93 00:36:04 -0700
Errors-To: atm-request@matmos.hpl.hp.com
X-Orig-Sender: atm-request@matmos.hpl.hp.com
X-Info: Submissions to atm@hpl.hp.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to atm-request@hpl.hp.com
X-Info: Archives via nic.hep.net:~ftp/lists-archive/atm
X-Loop: ATM CLP.bit ON
Precedence: bulk
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by matmos.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.4/HPL42.42) id AA04954; Tue, 19 Oct 93 00:36:01 -0700
Message-Id: <9310190736.AA04954@matmos.hpl.hp.com>
Received: from waffle.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.19192-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 19 Oct 1993 08:36:06 +0100
To: keshav@research.att.com
Cc: Mark Laubach <laubach@matmos.hpl.hp.com>, "matmos.hpl.hp.com.UUCP" <matmos.hpl.hp.com.UUCP@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>, atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, deering@parc.xerox.com, J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Classical Draft Status (long)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Oct 93 11:33:00 EDT." <9310181534.AA02920@matmos.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1993 08:36:03 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>


 >For supporting Quality of Service, IP is a mediocre but acceptable subnetwork
 >technology (QoS can be provided most efficiently and with minimum complexity over
 >connection-oriented, fixed-length-packet subnetworks, but with sufficient
 >underloading, can be provided over anything)
 
 >I guess we're quits...

 keshav
 
i guess  you havnt seen Van's Lightweight Sessions talk

what on earth do you mean by 'minimum complexity'?

 jon