Re: SNMPv2 fasttrack (was Re: Squashing important ideas
Cheryl Krupczak <cheryl@cc.gatech.edu> Wed, 03 February 1993 02:36 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20991; 2 Feb 93 21:36 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20987; 2 Feb 93 21:36 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01717; 2 Feb 93 21:36 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA01093> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Tue, 2 Feb 93 21:36:01 EST
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA01082> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Tue, 2 Feb 93 21:36:00 EST
Received: from terminus.cc.gatech.edu by burdell.cc.gatech.edu with SMTP id AA28433 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com>); Tue, 2 Feb 1993 21:35:59 -0500
Received: by terminus.cc.gatech.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14409; Tue, 2 Feb 93 21:35:51 EST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Cheryl Krupczak <cheryl@cc.gatech.edu>
Message-Id: <9302030235.AA14409@terminus.cc.gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: SNMPv2 fasttrack (was Re: Squashing important ideas
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1993 21:35:50 -0500
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
In-Reply-To: <0D15DDF1.p8lu9j@bir.bir.com>; from "Michael L. Kornegay" at Feb 2, 93 4:54 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
> >The SMP group developing a proposal on their own with or without direction >of the IETF is not bad! (I believe they had its blessing?) It was also an >excellent proposal. The process would have taken forever if they had not >made their contribution. Oh yes! I agree! I didn't mean to give an impression to the contrary. I think the SMP authors did us all a great service by laying the foundation. Thanks again, guys. > >What is bad is that when a working group was formed, that the IETF community >did not give adequate consideration to many important ideas, and treated the >proposal as gospel. I agree with this part too. :-( > >As far as time, many of you consider the process to have started at the >Boston IETF. I consider the process of adopting the SMP as SNMPv2 began >in November. Note that the SNMPv2 working group existed <= 2 months. Quite >a fast track if you ask me. > >---- >mlk@bir.com, mlk@bir.uucp, or bir!mlk (Michael L. Kornegay) > Cheryl cheryl@cc.gatech.edu --
- Re: SNMPv2 fasttrack (was Re: Squashing important… Cheryl Krupczak