Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83C81A039B for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGVPtPGCaW7Z for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2CE1A0398 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q59so1591877wes.7 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uJEXUlxsqkZT9mw8NHJ+K3kyiAxzcrGpmM9XCrK1Z5w=; b=NB2cpmeGY1+58ibvjJAR4AXmOTrdQqZKEmh6rCHBnbs6CG3wyYjCIXDBc6OhZQI1b3 lLnoGdsg9Vkh4Ox5g2R7Y4MQQSHKTtkG64hm8NTeDZKTGB9HqL9vsVstV1u3CsfImGHA 4TDm4L1B1wAVYLdEv6hGEx1j4k70U0kR/aaKXlsXeEKndNmotxaA/1saJLqDCg+Hm6ql UqMwfHIcHQh7AYY5VFDUQw20zcva3IpIvMKAdqUXN1eJGLu6VWkqDI4uyuIEVVHTh9eh 5dq5ee17qMjTBHsVK2wplMmuibjN+OZNm/Tp4Is4qYvKWVDAmBVsKBX4GDvDoXVY2v8D r1gw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.93.41 with SMTP id cr9mr9680271wib.7.1399498280243; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.93.68 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BC916E6C-2C7F-4252-8024-B4A691F3E26B@trammell.ch>
References: <536A6D71.9020201@gmail.com> <BC916E6C-2C7F-4252-8024-B4A691F3E26B@trammell.ch>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 16:31:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5-=q5RBE-B_iDfuoKyUr6-UQtzdYuiZKRsVf8oNP74mQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04389357db97ae04f8d61572"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/udp35/-cvO4FedDfRlXlidIWkvpCJj-NQ
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, udp35@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?
X-BeenThere: udp35@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Life beyond UDP <udp35.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/udp35/>
List-Post: <mailto:udp35@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 21:31:27 -0000

As Ted noted, this also impacts RAI area WGs. But, we don't have an area
meeting.  We do have the DISPATCH WG which is where we usually have these
sorts of discussions if needed (e.g., DART).

Mary.


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:

> hi Spencer,
>
> Yep. I'm not sure we'll be ready to have a whole dedicated slot... Perhaps
> a ten-minute blurb in each of appsarea and tsvarea, talking about the (1)
> current plan and perhaps the (2) outcome of the secret cabal meeting on
> Saturday in Toronto?
>
> (This implies that we'll have a hard requirement that the outcome of the
> secret cabal meeting is something that is baked enough to share, and to
> announce this or another list as open to subscribers to discuss.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
>
> On 7 May 2014, at 12:29, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We probably need to tell the broader community about this at IETF 90.
> TSVAREA? another non-WG-forming BOF? IAB slot?
> >
> > We don't have to decide now, but we probably do need to decide if we
> need a dedicated slot soon ...
> >
> > Spencer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Udp35 mailing list
> > Udp35@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
>
> _______________________________________________
> Udp35 mailing list
> Udp35@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
>