Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FA81A0257 for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtmV-tWOfzrG for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9451A0208 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hi2so86871wib.2 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MQ6ICqYJcs57X/jJKQO3KXrz6jwkWQi3ba5w8exyqKI=; b=gGHPT5Pn51HdMCW6uUcMz5JwfjISgJukwGtdO99tKKebsgJGCu3+3T5gS72CKkiAeA rkKQ1dAXu2/laAVT+pR0F2O7d5IqHcKq0sqkBqasxf+G0EX5iWFpktQEmrGzgXzDDBpi qwi5WqitN21uJ9XFDHw/Pn1boud+D7YZgA1AGBEhOrm0W9m7xjjBb522O5LHzNh4+BT/ AE/tT/ACtD8zPMqpxOok8Iq/ISM24X5r1kG8beIAg8/PJOlOxbacsFvvegLoDZBAVKBd N3FB3Rnk0D/uz3GUnlir67xFlBMTjxuxxO+5x8+WB/L823/1xFMJxeppECBZWD5EvUkk sXUQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.39 with SMTP id q7mr318011wiv.36.1399499104041; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.93.68 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A55FA467-8B14-47AC-9783-3B594143A626@trammell.ch>
References: <536A6D71.9020201@gmail.com> <BC916E6C-2C7F-4252-8024-B4A691F3E26B@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN5-=q5RBE-B_iDfuoKyUr6-UQtzdYuiZKRsVf8oNP74mQ@mail.gmail.com> <A55FA467-8B14-47AC-9783-3B594143A626@trammell.ch>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 16:45:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7Cd8TKENsivd-NUpPmdRrxnoUWJ4xcM+oWQ-sX0wfM_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04374abff5c17a04f8d6465d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/udp35/QuIDLzyuS3g8Qj3EX_N0frjfu1U
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, udp35@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?
X-BeenThere: udp35@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Life beyond UDP <udp35.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/udp35/>
List-Post: <mailto:udp35@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 21:45:11 -0000

DISPATCH gets the majority of the core RAI participants, so I'll add this
to the agenda. Just let me know how much time you might need.

Mary.


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:

> hi Mary,
>
> Good point. If enough of the right people will be in DISPATCH, then let's
> get it on the agenda there as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> On 7 May 2014, at 16:31, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As Ted noted, this also impacts RAI area WGs. But, we don't have an area
> meeting.  We do have the DISPATCH WG which is where we usually have these
> sorts of discussions if needed (e.g., DART).
> >
> > Mary.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> > hi Spencer,
> >
> > Yep. I'm not sure we'll be ready to have a whole dedicated slot...
> Perhaps a ten-minute blurb in each of appsarea and tsvarea, talking about
> the (1) current plan and perhaps the (2) outcome of the secret cabal
> meeting on Saturday in Toronto?
> >
> > (This implies that we'll have a hard requirement that the outcome of the
> secret cabal meeting is something that is baked enough to share, and to
> announce this or another list as open to subscribers to discuss.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > On 7 May 2014, at 12:29, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > We probably need to tell the broader community about this at IETF 90.
> TSVAREA? another non-WG-forming BOF? IAB slot?
> > >
> > > We don't have to decide now, but we probably do need to decide if we
> need a dedicated slot soon ...
> > >
> > > Spencer
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Udp35 mailing list
> > > Udp35@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Udp35 mailing list
> > Udp35@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> >
>
>