Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?

Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 07 May 2014 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1181A03A6 for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ypQ8nfRyWAv for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell1.nine.ch [5.148.172.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533F1A0400 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vpn-global-dhcp1-52.ethz.ch (vpn-global-dhcp1-52.ethz.ch [129.132.208.52]) by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E6861A0548; Thu, 8 May 2014 00:07:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN5R6ZAoS6W-t4V+vHS+HL9cped2b+vg6FAQ-KqdTr+0gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:07:02 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39A6C69C-8E1F-4487-90D2-E85AC610AA0E@trammell.ch>
References: <536A6D71.9020201@gmail.com> <BC916E6C-2C7F-4252-8024-B4A691F3E26B@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN5-=q5RBE-B_iDfuoKyUr6-UQtzdYuiZKRsVf8oNP74mQ@mail.gmail.com> <A55FA467-8B14-47AC-9783-3B594143A626@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN7Cd8TKENsivd-NUpPmdRrxnoUWJ4xcM+oWQ-sX0wfM_g@mail.gmail.com> <FA24C1CF-314A-4A92-92D1-60E12BB1ADD9@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN5R6ZAoS6W-t4V+vHS+HL9cped2b+vg6FAQ-KqdTr+0gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/udp35/T65U00zAMaSg3wUyuXe3p2wgWVg
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, udp35@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?
X-BeenThere: udp35@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Life beyond UDP <udp35.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/udp35/>
List-Post: <mailto:udp35@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 22:07:18 -0000

Maybe the final martini glass, and the rows we could agree on from transport dimensions...

On 7 May 2014, at 17:03, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure.  So, I could just include a chart or 2 in the chair chart package which is the usual for these sorts of things.
> 
> Mary. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> hi Mary,
> 
> I'm thinking 10 minutes: my guess is we'll only really be ready to point people at the list / an initial revision for an IAB draft, so I'm not sure it makes sense to have a big discussion slot in any of the area meetings.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brian
> 
> On 7 May 2014, at 16:45, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > DISPATCH gets the majority of the core RAI participants, so I'll add this to the agenda. Just let me know how much time you might need.
> >
> > Mary.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> > hi Mary,
> >
> > Good point. If enough of the right people will be in DISPATCH, then let's get it on the agenda there as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > On 7 May 2014, at 16:31, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > As Ted noted, this also impacts RAI area WGs. But, we don't have an area meeting.  We do have the DISPATCH WG which is where we usually have these sorts of discussions if needed (e.g., DART).
> > >
> > > Mary.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> > > hi Spencer,
> > >
> > > Yep. I'm not sure we'll be ready to have a whole dedicated slot... Perhaps a ten-minute blurb in each of appsarea and tsvarea, talking about the (1) current plan and perhaps the (2) outcome of the secret cabal meeting on Saturday in Toronto?
> > >
> > > (This implies that we'll have a hard requirement that the outcome of the secret cabal meeting is something that is baked enough to share, and to announce this or another list as open to subscribers to discuss.)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7 May 2014, at 12:29, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We probably need to tell the broader community about this at IETF 90. TSVAREA? another non-WG-forming BOF? IAB slot?
> > > >
> > > > We don't have to decide now, but we probably do need to decide if we need a dedicated slot soon ...
> > > >
> > > > Spencer
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Udp35 mailing list
> > > > Udp35@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Udp35 mailing list
> > > Udp35@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Udp35 mailing list
> Udp35@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35