Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: udp35@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244841A03DD for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Viq2f3i_ys2h for <udp35@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0A51A03DC for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1so1615052wgh.3 for <udp35@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 15:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=c52RXX+S2e1/GVEfBGubDD2RgwlsvkZSIxoBErln1Wc=; b=UoKdwESvu9lspCUL0h8mJ+Nu9qH5/sMb4NTsyQgWBsPCdXy6LTNEdfYZ2SWTIWD8w4 tCliWrsbe+OzAHnvz7qicNsN0iDjfZcdNubrp9/hWJz2+p6igMzySScXazPty67dbWnR xRwHIYpPx09dp2Kg9o6FyDK2dAcVNRCitzxLY6Qt2KdCjC+v4bdKpB5z0rz/SYboAnK3 xoRw47euheXTmgjlgGvXzZfLYUUMfhYENBDiVgfhbxzHiYF/olVFqPk/NLqJtQiAE9cW 9k2pDR8BbFHcdHKnZ5BOHowBqa83GGYzz0X2L8+j68PKe7rWk/W+KuHhT/32otCfFb1x /ycw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.8 with SMTP id v8mr10074280wja.53.1399500225114; Wed, 07 May 2014 15:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.93.68 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 15:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FA24C1CF-314A-4A92-92D1-60E12BB1ADD9@trammell.ch>
References: <536A6D71.9020201@gmail.com> <BC916E6C-2C7F-4252-8024-B4A691F3E26B@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN5-=q5RBE-B_iDfuoKyUr6-UQtzdYuiZKRsVf8oNP74mQ@mail.gmail.com> <A55FA467-8B14-47AC-9783-3B594143A626@trammell.ch> <CAHBDyN7Cd8TKENsivd-NUpPmdRrxnoUWJ4xcM+oWQ-sX0wfM_g@mail.gmail.com> <FA24C1CF-314A-4A92-92D1-60E12BB1ADD9@trammell.ch>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:03:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5R6ZAoS6W-t4V+vHS+HL9cped2b+vg6FAQ-KqdTr+0gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d8965c7f5ac04f8d68957"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/udp35/VishM4T-GdQnZbq95EE_ITI3J9U
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, udp35@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Udp35] How do we report this to the community?
X-BeenThere: udp35@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Life beyond UDP <udp35.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/udp35/>
List-Post: <mailto:udp35@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35>, <mailto:udp35-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 22:03:52 -0000

Sure.  So, I could just include a chart or 2 in the chair chart package
which is the usual for these sorts of things.

Mary.


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:

> hi Mary,
>
> I'm thinking 10 minutes: my guess is we'll only really be ready to point
> people at the list / an initial revision for an IAB draft, so I'm not sure
> it makes sense to have a big discussion slot in any of the area meetings.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> On 7 May 2014, at 16:45, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > DISPATCH gets the majority of the core RAI participants, so I'll add
> this to the agenda. Just let me know how much time you might need.
> >
> > Mary.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> > hi Mary,
> >
> > Good point. If enough of the right people will be in DISPATCH, then
> let's get it on the agenda there as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > On 7 May 2014, at 16:31, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > As Ted noted, this also impacts RAI area WGs. But, we don't have an
> area meeting.  We do have the DISPATCH WG which is where we usually have
> these sorts of discussions if needed (e.g., DART).
> > >
> > > Mary.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
> wrote:
> > > hi Spencer,
> > >
> > > Yep. I'm not sure we'll be ready to have a whole dedicated slot...
> Perhaps a ten-minute blurb in each of appsarea and tsvarea, talking about
> the (1) current plan and perhaps the (2) outcome of the secret cabal
> meeting on Saturday in Toronto?
> > >
> > > (This implies that we'll have a hard requirement that the outcome of
> the secret cabal meeting is something that is baked enough to share, and to
> announce this or another list as open to subscribers to discuss.)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7 May 2014, at 12:29, Spencer Dawkins <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We probably need to tell the broader community about this at IETF
> 90. TSVAREA? another non-WG-forming BOF? IAB slot?
> > > >
> > > > We don't have to decide now, but we probably do need to decide if we
> need a dedicated slot soon ...
> > > >
> > > > Spencer
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Udp35 mailing list
> > > > Udp35@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Udp35 mailing list
> > > Udp35@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/udp35
> > >
> >
> >
>
>